Hi Alex,
thanks for the reply and I see that I should have included more details. I
understand the design (but it was confusing at first) in general because we
have implemented YANG Push as well. However, I do not think
> you have a mandatory choice, but can select a case whose nodes are option
Hi,
I do not agree that a new datastore is needed to supposedly retrieve the
system created nodes that exist (already supported by get-data) or
the nodes that could be created by the server but do not currently exist.
The element is way too simplistic to represent all the real-world
possibiliti
Hi, Andy,
Apologize for my chiming in. Please see my reply inline.
From: netmod [mailto:netmod-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Andy Bierman
Sent: Wednesday, August 4, 2021 1:11 AM
To: Fengchong (frank)
Cc: Balázs Lengyel ;
netmod@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [netmod] 答复: system configuration sync mecha
Hi,andy,
发件人: Andy Bierman [mailto:a...@yumaworks.com]
发送时间: 2021年8月4日 1:11
收件人: Fengchong (frank)
抄送: Juergen Schoenwaelder ; Kent Watsen
; Balázs Lengyel
; netmod@ietf.org
主题: Re: [netmod] 答复: system configuration sync mechanism
On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 12:34 AM Fengchong (frank)
mailto:fra
I am just rereading this (sorry, it's been a while since we wrote this).
When you look at the modify-subscription RPC, the "case stream" itself is
optional, even if the choice "target" is mandatory. So, it is in fact optional
to include, no need to specify a null filter. (However, when present
Hi,
When you modify the subscription, you need to specify the subscription
parameters that you want to modify the subscription to - i.e. the subscription
parameters that you want to be in effect after modifying the subscription. If
you want nothing to be filtered, just specify a "null" filter.
[Cross posting to netconf]
> On Aug 3, 2021, at 6:01 AM, Michal Vaško wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> it seems the "modify-subscription" RPC [1] includes a mandatory choice
> "target" [2]. In effect, it is not possible to modify a subscription for it
> to be without a filter. I do not understand the reaso
On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 12:34 AM Fengchong (frank) <
frank.fengch...@huawei.com> wrote:
> Hi juergen,
> Please see my comments inline.
>
> /frank
>
> -邮件原件-
> 发件人: Jürgen Schönwälder [mailto:j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de]
> 发送时间: 2021年8月3日 12:15
> 收件人: Fengchong (frank)
> 抄送: An
Hi,
it seems the "modify-subscription" RPC [1] includes a mandatory choice "target"
[2]. In effect, it is not possible to modify a subscription for it to be
without a filter. I do not understand the reason for this, is it intentional or
an error in the module?
Regards,
Michal
[1] https://www.
On Tue, Aug 03, 2021 at 07:34:12AM +, Fengchong (frank) wrote:
> Hi juergen,
> Please see my comments inline.
>
> /frank
>
> -邮件原件-
> 发件人: Jürgen Schönwälder [mailto:j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de]
> 发送时间: 2021年8月3日 12:15
> 收件人: Fengchong (frank)
> 抄送: Andy Bierman ; Kent
Hi, Balázs,
Thanks for the comments, please see my reply inline.
P.S. I notice that some of the issues is related to auto-populate operation
from into (e.g., will not delete system configurations which
has already been populated into , allow a delete operation and reload
automatically).
Since t
Hi juergen,
Please see my comments inline.
/frank
-邮件原件-
发件人: Jürgen Schönwälder [mailto:j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de]
发送时间: 2021年8月3日 12:15
收件人: Fengchong (frank)
抄送: Andy Bierman ; Kent Watsen ;
Balázs Lengyel ; netmod@ietf.org
主题: Re: [netmod] 答复: system configuration sy
12 matches
Mail list logo
