On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 5:17 AM Balázs Lengyel
wrote:
> Hello Rob,
>
> I think this won’t fly.
>
> In sections 1.2 and 2 we state:
>
> *“**Instance data files MAY contain partial data sets.”*
>
> Which is important for many use-cases. This means you cannot say that a
> default value will or mus
Hello Rob,
I think this won’t fly.
In sections 1.2 and 2 we state:
“Instance data files MAY contain partial data sets.”
Which is important for many use-cases. This means you cannot say that a
default value will or must be included, as they might be omitted because they
are not part of the pa
Hi,
Sorry for getting late into this already unwieldy thread. Similar discussions
have been flaring up regularly for as long as this work group has existed, and
we have never been able to put it to final rest. At the heart of the issue is
the age old division between "unpredictable" and "lazy"
Hi Balazs, Andy, Netmod,
Sorry for the delayed response. I would still like to strength the description
of the defaults. E.g., RFC 6243 uses MUSTs rather than SHOULDs.
Hence, I have generated some proposed alternative descriptions, that are
somewhat stricter, but also more generically focusse
