From: STARK, BARBARA H
Sent: 15 September 2021 13:51
> Barbara
>
> Top posting a slightly different question.
>
> Belatedly doing my homework, I see that not all the NULL are uint16. One,
> next-hop, is ip-address. We have the options discussed for uint16 but could
> also
> use zero (or some o
On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 8:44 AM Balázs Lengyel
wrote:
> Hello Rob,
>
> I can live with this, if Andy accepts.
>
This is OK
> Regards Balazs
>
Andy
>
>
> *From:* Rob Wilton (rwilton)
> *Sent:* 2021. szeptember 15., szerda 11:57
> *To:* Andy Bierman ; Balázs Lengyel <
> balazs.leng...@erics
> Barbara
>
> Top posting a slightly different question.
>
> Belatedly doing my homework, I see that not all the NULL are uint16. One,
> next-hop, is ip-address. We have the options discussed for uint16 but could
> also
> use zero (or some other value) to mean NULL. Zero is of course the way
Barbara
Top posting a slightly different question.
Belatedly doing my homework, I see that not all the NULL are uint16. One,
next-hop, is ip-address. We have the options discussed for uint16 but could
also use zero (or some other value) to mean NULL. Zero is of course the way
the default is
> -Original Message-
> From: Joe Clarke (jclarke)
> Sent: 14 September 2021 20:38
> To: Rob Wilton (rwilton) ; netmod@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: Revision-labels within filenames
>
> > I wasn't thinking of a URL to get the revision-label, I was more thinking
> > of a
> URL to identify the
From: netmod on behalf of Jürgen Schönwälder
Sent: 15 September 2021 00:53
On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 01:01:11AM +0200, Carsten Bormann wrote:
> > If BBF already
> > defined to use -1, so be it.
>
> That works for me and is consistent with the information model in 9046.
>
> What I find not so grea
