Thank you to those that have filled out the Doodle poll.
I will be finalizing the Doodle poll in few hours, in case anyone wants to fill
it out (link below).
Currently, there is one slot having the most number of selections, followed
closely by another option, followed by quite a number of
Jernej Tuljak wrote:
>
>
> On 30/09/2021 10:48, Martin Björklund wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Jernej Tuljak wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> can someone clarify the meaning of the following bullet in Section 11,
> >> RFC7950:
> >>
> >> o A "base" statement may be removed from an "identityref" type,
>
On 30/09/2021 10:48, Martin Björklund wrote:
Hi,
Jernej Tuljak wrote:
Hi,
can someone clarify the meaning of the following bullet in Section 11,
RFC7950:
o A "base" statement may be removed from an "identityref" type,
provided there is at least one "base" statement left.
This
Hi,
Jernej Tuljak wrote:
> Hi,
>
> can someone clarify the meaning of the following bullet in Section 11,
> RFC7950:
>
>o A "base" statement may be removed from an "identityref" type,
> provided there is at least one "base" statement left.
>
> This seems to enable the value space
Hi,
can someone clarify the meaning of the following bullet in Section 11,
RFC7950:
o A "base" statement may be removed from an "identityref" type,
provided there is at least one "base" statement left.
This seems to enable the value space of a definition to narrow across
revisions
