A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Network Modeling WG of the IETF.
Title : Common YANG Data Types
Author : Juergen Schoenwaelder
Filename: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-b
On 14. 01. 22 12:23, Martin Björklund wrote:
Hi,
Ok, I think I understand what he means. With this XML:
nsfmi:memory-alarm
the prefix "nsfmi" is present in the element data, which means that
in order to implement this properly, the XML parser must pass the
namespace mappings
From: Martin Björklund
Sent: 14 January 2022 11:41
tom petch wrote:
> From: Martin Björklund
> Sent: 14 January 2022 11:23
>
> Hi,
>
> Ok, I think I understand what he means. With this XML:
>
>
> nsfmi:memory-alarm
>
>
> the prefix "nsfmi" is present in the element data, which mean
tom petch wrote:
> From: Martin Björklund
> Sent: 14 January 2022 11:23
>
> Hi,
>
> Ok, I think I understand what he means. With this XML:
>
>
> nsfmi:memory-alarm
>
>
> the prefix "nsfmi" is present in the element data, which means that
> in order to implement this properly, the
From: Martin Björklund
Sent: 14 January 2022 11:23
Hi,
Ok, I think I understand what he means. With this XML:
nsfmi:memory-alarm
the prefix "nsfmi" is present in the element data, which means that
in order to implement this properly, the XML parser must pass the
namespace mappings
From: Martin Björklund
Sent: 14 January 2022 10:39
To: tom petch
Cc: netmod@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [netmod] XML and prefix
Hi,
I don't understand the problem either. He writes:
> Sorry, but this has the same problem in figure 11.1 that we've just been
> discussing with Ian.
Can you send a poin
Hi,
Ok, I think I understand what he means. With this XML:
nsfmi:memory-alarm
the prefix "nsfmi" is present in the element data, which means that
in order to implement this properly, the XML parser must pass the
namespace mappings to the user code.
So he proposes to add to the draf
On 14. 01. 22 11:39, Martin Björklund wrote:
Hi,
I don't understand the problem either. He writes:
Sorry, but this has the same problem in figure 11.1 that we've just been
discussing with Ian.
Can you send a pointer to that discussion? Perhaps there's more
context there.
Right. I also su
Hi,
I don't understand the problem either. He writes:
> Sorry, but this has the same problem in figure 11.1 that we've just been
> discussing with Ian.
Can you send a pointer to that discussion? Perhaps there's more
context there.
/martin
tom petch wrote:
> I see that IANA have taken to a
I see that IANA have taken to asking XML Registry experts about the
registration of YANG namespaces at Last Call, or perhaps they have always done
this but have only recently put the e-mail on a public list. Anyhow, the
experts have taken it upon themselves to comment on the XML examples and I
10 matches
Mail list logo