Re: [netmod] IPR Poll on draft-ietf-netmod-node-tags-06

2022-04-09 Thread liupeng...@chinamobile.com
Hi, all "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" Regards Peng Liu liupeng...@chinamobile.com From: Du Zongpeng Date: 2022-04-10 09:49 To: 'Benoit Claise'; 'Kent Watsen'; 'Qin Wu'; 'Peng Liu'; 'Mohamed Boucadair' CC: 'Liang Geng'; netmod@ietf.org Subject: RE: IPR Poll on draf

Re: [netmod] [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-extended-lsa-yang-10.txt

2022-04-09 Thread Andy Bierman
On Sat, Apr 9, 2022 at 11:00 AM Acee Lindem (acee) wrote: > Hi Andy, > > > > My opinion remains the same that RFC 4001 got it right with types > including the zone specification being the exception rather than the > default. I know that when people think IP address, they think the dotted 4 > octe

Re: [netmod] [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-extended-lsa-yang-10.txt

2022-04-09 Thread Acee Lindem (acee)
Hi Andy, My opinion remains the same that RFC 4001 got it right with types including the zone specification being the exception rather than the default. I know that when people think IP address, they think the dotted 4 octet without “%” appended. I’d still like to know if there are products

Re: [netmod] [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-extended-lsa-yang-10.txt

2022-04-09 Thread Acee Lindem (acee)
I hate when people selectively snip my Emails and respond out of context. Please don't do that in the future! I'll reply to the more constructive thread. Acee On 4/8/22, 4:45 PM, "Lsr on behalf of Randy Presuhn" wrote: Hi - On 2022-04-08 12:25 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote: ...

Re: [netmod] [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-extended-lsa-yang-10.txt

2022-04-09 Thread Andy Bierman
On Sat, Apr 9, 2022 at 9:51 AM Randy Presuhn < randy_pres...@alumni.stanford.edu> wrote: > Hi - > > On 2022-04-09 4:36 AM, Christian Hopps wrote: > ... > > FWIW, I'm not arguing for this change; however, to be fair, isn't this > > also about the existing published modules that are using the incorr

Re: [netmod] [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-extended-lsa-yang-10.txt

2022-04-09 Thread Randy Presuhn
Hi - On 2022-04-09 4:36 AM, Christian Hopps wrote: ... FWIW, I'm not arguing for this change; however, to be fair, isn't this also about the existing published modules that are using the incorrect type? No. "Incorrect type" is a bit of a mischaracterization. It's like saying using "int32" i

Re: [netmod] IPR Poll on draft-ietf-netmod-node-tags-06

2022-04-09 Thread Benoit Claise
"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" Regards, Benoit On 4/8/2022 8:09 PM, Kent Watsen wrote: [ Note: existing IPR declaration: https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/4216 ] Authors, Contributors, WG, As part of WG Last Call: Are you aware of any IPR that app

Re: [netmod] [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-extended-lsa-yang-10.txt

2022-04-09 Thread Christian Hopps
Randy Presuhn writes: 30+ years of tradition (and BCP) not permitting types to be changed after they've been published, I suppose, motivated by our total lack of control over unpublished usage of these types after their definitions have been published. If there were actually something wrong w

Re: [netmod] [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-extended-lsa-yang-10.txt

2022-04-09 Thread tom petch
From: tom petch Sent: 08 April 2022 17:32 From: Lsr on behalf of Joel M. Halpern Sent: 07 April 2022 18:51 Given that you are asking for an incompatible change to an existing module, the shoe would seem to be on the other foot. If you could show it was necessary to make such an incompatible