[netmod] What's the plan with draft-ietf-netmod-node-tags

2022-10-10 Thread Adrian Farrel
Hi, Discussion of this document seemed to fizzle out in August, and the last email seems to be Qin saying "I'm happy to make no change if no change is needed." Where does that leave us with regards to the WG last call comments and the discussion at IETF-114? Thanks, Adrian _

Re: [netmod] YANG module versioning: Proposed change to "Import by derived revision"

2022-10-10 Thread Andy Bierman
On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 at 7:02 AM Rob Wilton (rwilton) wrote: > Hi Juergen, WG, > > draft-ietf-netmod-yang-module-versioning defines section "4. Import by > derived revision" that allows an author to specify a minimum revision of a > module that is allowed to satisfy a YANG import. > > IIRC, and ho

Re: [netmod] What's the plan with draft-ietf-netmod-node-tags

2022-10-10 Thread Lou Berger
Adrian, Thanks for this -- as far as I can tell, Jurgen's comments were not addressed in the on-list discussion in August.  Do think that they were?  We were at least expecting some document update based on the discussion. Authors/Contributors,     Where do you think we stand in resolving t

[netmod] IETF 115 Slot Requests

2022-10-10 Thread Lou Berger
WG, The *draft* agenda for IETF115 has been posted - https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/115/agenda The NetMod session information is scheduled to be held: Tuesday, November 8, 2022 09:30-11:30 Tuesday Session I Richmond 4 https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/115/sessions/netmod.ic

Re: [netmod] What's the plan with draft-ietf-netmod-node-tags

2022-10-10 Thread Qin Wu
Hi, Lou and Adrian: We authors plan to issue a new version. We heard some feedback from Balazs and Rob, had some offline discussion with them during last IETF, come up with proposal and questions and brought up on the list on August, Juergen provided his thoughts on these proposal, it looks addi