Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bis-14.txt

2022-12-07 Thread Jürgen Schönwälder
On Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 03:02:39AM +, Kent Watsen wrote: > > We are addressing the current/existing confusion, as discussed in the last 9 > months and in a virtual interim. Not doing anything would be truly unhelpful. > > The strategy is to gradually move towards having only explicit names.

Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bis-14.txt

2022-12-07 Thread Andy Bierman
On Wed, Dec 7, 2022 at 7:02 PM Kent Watsen wrote: > > >> Deprecating ip-address (and ipv4-address and ipv6-address?) is probably > the > >> most disruptive > >> change to YANG that one could make. > > No, the most disruptive thing would be to do what roughly 1/2 of the WG > was proposing before,

Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bis-14.txt

2022-12-07 Thread Kent Watsen
>> Deprecating ip-address (and ipv4-address and ipv6-address?) is probably the >> most disruptive >> change to YANG that one could make. No, the most disruptive thing would be to do what roughly 1/2 of the WG was proposing before, which is to introduce now a non-backwards compatible change i

Re: [netmod] How many "digital twins" every single network should have? Who would map between "twins"?

2022-12-07 Thread Vasilenko Eduard
Hi Jan, Thanks for you your answer. Reading more I have found more evidence that the “digital network twin” should be single/unified for a network of any size: - I did mention below OpenConfig that had merged configuration and operational data models many years ago, - RFC8342 is asking for the sa

Re: [netmod] How many "digital twins" every single network should have? Who would map between "twins"?

2022-12-07 Thread Jan Lindblad
Hi Eduard, > Hi Automation Gurus, > YANG modules may be treated like a “digital twin” of the network with > different resolution/accuracy (depending on Module details). > It looks like RFC 8969 is discussing that different YANG models (for > different layers or functions) of the same network sho

Re: [netmod] The NETMOD WG has placed draft-dbb-netmod-acl in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"

2022-12-07 Thread Lou Berger
No, a formal adoption call is forthcoming. We just started the process with the ior call, updated the data tracker and it sent the mail. Stay tuned... Lou On December 6, 2022 6:57:53 PM Mahesh Jethanandani wrote: Is this in-lieu of a call for adoption, or di

Re: [netmod] The NETMOD WG has placed draft-dbb-netmod-acl in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"

2022-12-07 Thread Acee Lindem (acee)
NETMOD WG, From: netmod on behalf of Mahesh Jethanandani Date: Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 6:58 PM To: "netmod-cha...@ietf.org" Cc: netmod Subject: Re: [netmod] The NETMOD WG has placed draft-dbb-netmod-acl in state "Candidate for WG Adoption" Is this in-lieu of a call for adoption, or did

Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bis-14.txt

2022-12-07 Thread Martin Björklund
Andy Bierman wrote: > On Mon, Dec 5, 2022 at 2:37 PM Jürgen Schönwälder < > j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de> wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 05, 2022 at 08:19:12PM +, Kent Watsen wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi Juergen, > > > > > > > > > > > > >> 3) There are two "time-with-zone-offset" typedefs (o