[netmod] 答复: CORE-SID and SX:structure and draft-ietf-anima-rfc8366bis-01.txt

2023-01-11 Thread Fengchong (frank)
Hi Michael, You can use augment-structure to extend a yang structure. -邮件原件- 发件人: netmod [mailto:netmod-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Michael Richardson 发送时间: 2023年1月12日 2:18 收件人: an...@ietf.org; netmod@ietf.org 抄送: c...@ietf.org 主题: [netmod] CORE-SID and SX:structure and draft-ietf-anima-rfc8366

[netmod] YANG Versioning Weekly Call Minutes - 2023-01-10

2023-01-11 Thread Jason Sterne (Nokia)
YANG Versioning Weekly Call Minutes - 2023-01-10 We have reached rough consensus on Issue #182 / PR #189: - The top level NBC marker is a "MUST" if any rules are broken (even if a vendor knows the change is BC for their server) - Reshad will take a final look at text and close the issue/Precedenc

[netmod] 答复: question about name without prefix in XPath expression

2023-01-11 Thread Fengchong (frank)
Lada, For example: Module a { namespace "http://example.com/a";; typedef instance-ref { type leafref { path "instances/instance/name"; } } container instances { list instance { key name; leaf name { type string; }

[netmod] CORE-SID and SX:structure and draft-ietf-anima-rfc8366bis-01.txt

2023-01-11 Thread Michael Richardson
TL;DR> we can not use augment to get the behaviour that we want of being to extend existing YANG modules with new attributes. We have to revise 8366 each time we want extend things. This email details the work to make that occur. internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote: > Title

Re: [netmod] WG adoption call: draft-dbb-netmod-acl-03

2023-01-11 Thread Benoit Claise
Support adoption. Regards, Benoit On 12/20/2022 12:00 AM, Lou Berger wrote: Hello, This email begins a 3-week adoption poll for: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dbb-netmod-acl/ Please voice your support or technical objections to adoption on the list by the end of the day (any time z

Re: [netmod] question about name without prefix in XPath expression

2023-01-11 Thread tom petch
From: netmod on behalf of Ladislav Lhotka Sent: 11 January 2023 07:42 Dne 11. 01. 23 v 4:16 Fengchong (frank) napsal(a): > > In RFC 7950 section 6.4.1: > > o Names without a namespace prefix belong to the same namespace as > >the identifier of the current node. Inside a grouping,