On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 5:13 PM Robert Varga wrote:
> On 30/05/2023 20.28, Jürgen Schönwälder wrote:
> >It is unclear what "identical" means here. If two people extract a
> >module from an RFC, they may not end up with identical byte
> >sequences. So does white space matter when we
On 30/05/2023 20.28, Jürgen Schönwälder wrote:
It is unclear what "identical" means here. If two people extract a
module from an RFC, they may not end up with identical byte
sequences. So does white space matter when we talk about MUST be
identical? What about comments? The problem
On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 10:49:15PM +, Kent Watsen wrote:
> Dear NETMOD WG,
>
> This message begins a joint two-week WGLC for
> draft-ietf-netmod-yang-semver-11 and
> draft-ietf-netmod-yang-module-versioning-09
> ending on Monday, May 22nd. Neither draft has IPR declared. Here are the
>
On 30/05/2023 17.23, Jason Sterne (Nokia) wrote:
(changing subject for a dedicated thread on the filename)
What the draft was mainly trying to achieve (IMO) wrt filename was to
have a standard format/separator (#) when using a revision-label.
i.e. **if** anyone is to use a revision-label,
Thank you for the review, Alex. A big thanks for catching the sync issue with
yang-module-versioning. I have updated the text in GitHub pending the end of
WGLC to make sure we capture all of the feedback.
The diff can be found at
(changing subject for a dedicated thread on the filename)
What the draft was mainly trying to achieve (IMO) wrt filename was to have a
standard format/separator (#) when using a revision-label.
i.e. *if* anyone is to use a revision-label, then it should be done with
#.yang.
(and some users
Dear Rob,
I will provide a review of the two documents in a separate message. I
am flexible on the way forward as long as we do not claim that YANG
1.1 means something different tomorrow than it does today.
To me, the versioning work also remains incomplete since it is not
clear how a server
Hi Juergen, Andy,
With an author/contributor hat on ...
It is unclear to me, from an RFC document perspective, what is being proposed
here, and appreciate that each of you may have different thoughts as to what is
being proposed.
E.g., are you proposing:
(1) That the yang module versioning
Hello Team,
Gentle remainder on the below query.
Regards,
Ramana
From: Vanapatla Ramana (Nokia)
Sent: Friday, May 5, 2023 8:05 PM
To: draft-ietf-netmod-ent...@ietf.org; netmod@ietf.org
Cc: Bart Bogaert (Nokia) ; Ludwig Pauwels (Nokia)
; Yves Beauville (Nokia)
Subject: Query RFC-8348 hardware
