[netmod] YANG Versioning: Key Issues #2 and #3 - revision labels

2023-07-19 Thread Jason Sterne (Nokia)
Hi all, The weekly call group thought it would be good to provide an advance look at Key Issues #2 and #3 before the IETF117 NETMOD meeting. For now on the list let's continue the focus on K1 but we'll start in on K2 & K3 (if there is time) at IETF117. Key Issue #2: Single v/s multiple

Re: [netmod] YANG Versioning: Key Issue #1 - Allow NBC changes in YANG 1.0 & YANG 1.1 or not?

2023-07-19 Thread Jason Sterne (Nokia)
We considered this approach as well in the weekly calls but in the end felt that was just dodging the problem. We have a set of “MUST” rules that we know need to occasionally be broken. Shouldn’t we officialize this so our behavior and documents match? (i.e. SHOULD NOT instead of MUST)? It

Re: [netmod] YANG Versioning: Key Issue #1 - Allow NBC changes in YANG 1.0 & YANG 1.1 or not?

2023-07-19 Thread Andy Bierman
On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 4:48 AM Martin Björklund wrote: > What about Option 4 - Pragmatic Adherence to Current RFC7950 Rules > > This is the approach I also suggested on the mailing list. > - As it works today; the IETF *has* published bugfixed modules that break > the > rules. (and many

[netmod] YANG Versioning: weekly call Tues July 25 cancelled

2023-07-19 Thread Jason Sterne (Nokia)
Hi all, The weekly YANG Versioning call is cancelled on Tues July 25th. Have fun at IETF117! Jason (he/him) ___ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod