Re: [netmod] Poll on YANG Versioning NBC Approach

I disagree with the poll. There are important teachnigal differences behind the two options that this polls tries to hide. Updating YANG 1 and YANG 1.1 means creating YANG 1' and YANG 1.1'. There is no way that a new versioning approach will be understood by existing YANG tooling. That's an illusi

[netmod] Poll on YANG Versioning NBC Approach

WG, Please help the YANG-versioning effort move forward by participating in the following poll: - https://notes.ietf.org/netmod-2023-sept-poll (Datatracker login required) Kent and Lou ___ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/m

[netmod] WG adoption call: draft-boucadair-netmod-rfc8407bis-02

Hello, This email begins a 2-week adoption poll for: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-boucadair-netmod-rfc8407bis/ Please voice your support or technical objections to adoption on the list by the end of the day (any time zone) Sept 25. Thank you, Lou (as Co-chair) _

Re: [netmod] Adoption poll for draft-ma-netmod-immutable-flag-08

Hi all, I support adoption of this document. I think it is a good starting point and provide an explicit way to document config data node access restriction rules and make it visible to all clients, this is important for network automation and in addition to improve interoperability for differe