I support adoption of the document as well. Adopting conventions for modeling
different types of information will make the models easier to consume.
Thanks,
Acee
> On Sep 13, 2023, at 17:53, Mahesh Jethanandani
> wrote:
>
> Support this effort, and agree that this document should be continuo
Reading and responding is easier if people use email clients that can
properly quote text...
On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 08:11:25AM +, maqiufang (A) wrote:
Hi, Jürgen
Thanks a lot for the thorough review, please see my reply inline...
-Original Message-
From: netmod [mailto:netmod-boun..
Support this effort, and agree that this document should be continuously
updated as new recommendations are agreed upon.
> On Sep 11, 2023, at 3:22 PM, Lou Berger wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> This email begins a 2-week adoption poll for:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-boucadair-netmod-rfc8
I support the adoption of this document as a WG draft
Previous discussion on the mailing list has shown that there are use cases
where providing this information would be beneficial
I would prefer to have one solution standardized by IETF to address this
problem instead of a proliferation of ve
I also support the adoption of this draft as WG
Italo
> -Original Message-
> From: Benoit Claise
> Sent: mercoledì 13 settembre 2023 08:51
> To: adr...@olddog.co.uk; 'Lou Berger' ; 'NETMOD Group'
>
> Cc: 'NetMod WG Chairs'
> Subject: Re: [netmod] WG adoption call: draft-boucadair-netmo
On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 4:09 PM Kent Watsen wrote:
> [All, don’t forget to vote, discussion here doesn’t count!
> https://notes.ietf.org/netmod-2023-sept-poll]
>
>
> On Sep 12, 2023, at 12:06 PM, Andy Bierman wrote:
>
> So there is choice between:
>
> (A) YANG 1.1 and SHOULD NOT
> (B) YANG 1
Dne 13. 09. 23 v 16:06 Jernej Tuljak napsal(a):
On 13/09/2023 14:26, Jan Lindblad (jlindbla) wrote:
Jernej,
Hat off for the tools (and tool vendors!) that assist authors to stay
true to YANG RFC sections 10 and 11 also. Well done. :-)
I intentionally used "compiler" rather than "toolchain"
On 13/09/2023 14:26, Jan Lindblad (jlindbla) wrote:
Jernej,
Hat off for the tools (and tool vendors!) that assist authors to stay
true to YANG RFC sections 10 and 11 also. Well done. :-)
I intentionally used "compiler" rather than "toolchain", "IDE" or
something more open ended, because a co
Jernej,
Hat off for the tools (and tool vendors!) that assist authors to stay true to
YANG RFC sections 10 and 11 also. Well done. :-)
I intentionally used "compiler" rather than "toolchain", "IDE" or something
more open ended, because a compiler is what I have and can speak for.
Even so, I ha
On 12/09/2023 14:43, Jan Lindblad (jlindbla) wrote:
Jürgen, all,
I see the irony in changing the YANG RFC(s) without updating the YANG language
version number, but digging a bit deeper, I think the question is not as
clear-cut as it might seem at first.
Altering the contents of the backwards-
Hi, Jürgen
Thanks a lot for the thorough review, please see my reply inline...
-Original Message-
From: netmod [mailto:netmod-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jürgen Sch?nw?lder
Sent: Saturday, September 9, 2023 5:09 AM
To: Jan Lindblad
Cc: netmod@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [netmod] Adoption po
11 matches
Mail list logo
