Re: [netmod] Poll on YANG Versioning NBC Approach

On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 11:46 AM Jürgen Schönwälder wrote: > If the poll does not say what you want it to say, then the poll is > broken. > > Right now, I see the following solution proposals floating around: > > 1) We change a single sentence in RFC 7950 and put an end to a >multi-year

Re: [netmod] Poll on YANG Versioning NBC Approach

On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 10:09 AM Acee Lindem wrote: > > > On Sep 14, 2023, at 12:40, Andy Bierman wrote: > > > > On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 9:05 AM Acee Lindem wrote: > >> >> >> > On Sep 13, 2023, at 10:36, Ladislav Lhotka > 40nic...@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > Dne 13. 09. 23 v

Re: [netmod] Poll on YANG Versioning NBC Approach

If the poll does not say what you want it to say, then the poll is broken. Right now, I see the following solution proposals floating around: 1) We change a single sentence in RFC 7950 and put an end to a multi-year effort that causes the AD to block other work from moving forward. 2) We

Re: [netmod] Poll on YANG Versioning NBC Approach

> On Sep 14, 2023, at 12:40, Andy Bierman wrote: > > > > On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 9:05 AM Acee Lindem > wrote: >> >> >> > On Sep 13, 2023, at 10:36, Ladislav Lhotka >> > mailto:40nic...@dmarc.ietf.org>> >> > wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > Dne 13. 09. 23 v 16:06

Re: [netmod] Poll on YANG Versioning NBC Approach

On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 9:05 AM Acee Lindem wrote: > > > > On Sep 13, 2023, at 10:36, Ladislav Lhotka 40nic...@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > Dne 13. 09. 23 v 16:06 Jernej Tuljak napsal(a): > >> On 13/09/2023 14:26, Jan Lindblad (jlindbla) wrote: > >>> Jernej, > >>> > >>> Hat off for

Re: [netmod] Poll on YANG Versioning NBC Approach

> On Sep 13, 2023, at 10:36, Ladislav Lhotka > wrote: > > > > Dne 13. 09. 23 v 16:06 Jernej Tuljak napsal(a): >> On 13/09/2023 14:26, Jan Lindblad (jlindbla) wrote: >>> Jernej, >>> >>> Hat off for the tools (and tool vendors!) that assist authors to stay true >>> to YANG RFC sections 10

Re: [netmod] Poll on YANG Versioning NBC Approach

I think it has been mentioned, but maybe worth repeating: this poll is *NOT* about accepting the entire Module Versioning + YANG Semver content as it currently stands. We separated out the first of several key issues to try and make progress. This is just the basic fundamental decision of

Re: [netmod] WG adoption call: draft-boucadair-netmod-rfc8407bis-02

From: netmod on behalf of Mahesh Jethanandani Sent: 13 September 2023 22:53 Support this effort, and agree that this document should be continuously updated as new recommendations are agreed upon. like rfc6991-bis? Tom Petch On Sep 11, 2023, at 3:22 PM, Lou Berger

Re: [netmod] Poll on YANG Versioning NBC Approach

On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 01:42:57PM +, Rob Wilton (rwilton) wrote: > > I think that for this first poll this is the question that we should > initially focus on. I.e., at a starting point, do you agree to updating RFC > 6020, RFC 7950, to allow changing the MUST to a SHOULD without a new

Re: [netmod] Poll on YANG Versioning NBC Approach

On 9/13/2023 4:36 PM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: Dne 13. 09. 23 v 16:06 Jernej Tuljak napsal(a): On 13/09/2023 14:26, Jan Lindblad (jlindbla) wrote: Jernej, Hat off for the tools (and tool vendors!) that assist authors to stay true to YANG RFC sections 10 and 11 also. Well done. :-) I