Internet-Draft draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis-03.txt is now available. It is a
work item of the Network Modeling (NETMOD) WG of the IETF.
Title: Guidelines for Authors and Reviewers of Documents Containing YANG
Data Models
Authors: Mohamed Boucadair
Qin Wu
Name:
Like I said, I respect Mahesh’s input as original author. It’s hard to
disagree with that. That said, I think the original RFC8519 is useful on its
own, and these proposed extensions add value that may not be needed by
everyone. I’d much rather see this new work progress rather than opening
The question in the WG for the ACL Extensions draft was whether the draft
should be an augmentation of the base ACL model, or a -bis of RFC 8519. Lou
brought some clarity by saying that if the base model could exist by itself
without these extensions, then it should be treated as an
My confusion, sorry, I was thinking “mandatory”.
Must statements on opstate are useful, but less important.
Kent
> On Nov 6, 2023, at 5:26 PM, Kent Watsen wrote:
>
> “Must” statements on opstate usefully helps clients know when certain values
> will always appear, enabling better
