Mahesh,
the main goal of these definition is compatibility with the
representations of zone names and identifeirs that systems use
natively (say on the command line), compatibility with what is
allowed in URLs is a lower priority issue. The changes that were
made were motivated by the fact that s
Hi Mahesh,
I stopped working on this document since the AD indicated that he will
refuse any non-backwards compatible changes (regardless whether they
can be considered bug fixes). And I am personally also not happy about
some of the new naming conventions (which this message/thread was
about). I
I notice that draft-ietf-6man-rfc6874bis has expired. What is the plan with
that document? Was there any consensus on the zone identifier?
I ask, because I am interested in moving rfc6991-bis forward. Can we close on
this thread with lowercase and % encoding of special characters as the
consens
Hi Juergen,
Reviving this thread to identify next steps for the document. Where are we with
publishing a -16 version of the draft?
I do not see objections to most of your suggestions on the changes you
recommend. For milli vs micro part of the discussion, could we have both?
Separately, on the
