[Removing IESG to avoid waste of bandwidth]
While I do not mind too much expanding the grouping, it would be useful to
graphically indicate that this is an expanded grouping/imported model.
-éric
From: Mahesh Jethanandani
Date: Thursday, 5 September 2024 at 00:43
To: Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
Cc:
Hi Eric,
> On Sep 4, 2024, at 12:30 PM, Eric Vyncke (evyncke) wrote:
>
> Mahesh and Joe,
>
> Thanks for your prompt replies.
>
> Understood for NETMOD vs. OPSAWG (both charters allow it anyway, a strange
> overlap though).
>
> Agreed on all the proposed changes, they make the text better.
Mahesh and Joe,
Thanks for your prompt replies.
Understood for NETMOD vs. OPSAWG (both charters allow it anyway, a strange
overlap though).
Agreed on all the proposed changes, they make the text better.
Now, about the tree representation, I wonder how it could be improved by
clearly delineati
Jumping in as a co-editor…
That is correct. Would it help if the word collector was used? Something like
OLD:
It is intended this model be used by vendors who implement syslog in their
systems.
NEW:
It is intended this model be used by vendors who implement syslog collector in
their systems.
[Speaking as an author]
Hi Eric,
> On Sep 4, 2024, at 2:32 AM, Éric Vyncke via Datatracker
> wrote:
>
> Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-32: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email
Re-,
Please see inline.
Cheers,
Med
De : Kent Watsen
Envoyé : mercredi 4 septembre 2024 15:29
À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET ; Amanda Baber
Cc : netmod@ietf.org; Amanda Baber via RT
Objet : Re: [netmod] Regarding draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis
Hi Amanda,
Please find one comment
Hi Med,
A number of client-server drafts (in the NETCONF WG) are in AUTH48. One
AD-level issue raised on all the drafts regards the Security Considerations
section not following the template in RFC 8407 or the template in rfc8407bis.
You can see the discussion below.
My suggestion follows.
Hi Amanda,
Please find one comment for you below.
Hi Med,
Please see below for replies to other comments.
Kent
> On Sep 4, 2024, at 8:12 AM, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com wrote:
>
> Hi Kent, all,
> (apologies for the delay to follow-up as I was out of office)
>
> Please see
Hi Kent, all,
(apologies for the delay to follow-up as I was out of office)
Please see inline.
Cheers,
Med
De : Kent Watsen
Envoyé : dimanche 11 août 2024 20:48
À : netmod@ietf.org
Objet : [netmod] Regarding draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis
The minutes for the NETMOD 120 session [0] captures this
Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-32: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer t
10 matches
Mail list logo
