Hi Rob,
We are unable to verify this erratum that the submitter marked as editorial.
Please note that we have changed the “Type” of the following errata
report to “Technical”. As Stream Approver, please review and set the
Status and Type accordingly (see the definitions at
Hi Andy,
Please see inline.
Cheers,
Med
De : Andy Bierman
Envoyé : mardi 11 avril 2023 16:58
À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET
Cc : RFC Errata System ; netmod@ietf.org
Objet : Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8407 (7416)
On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 10:19 PM
On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 10:19 PM wrote:
> Hi Andy,
>
>
>
> Which convention are you referring to?
>
>
>
I mixed up the "prefix table" with "RFC ".
Your fix is not correct.
The correct convention is more like:
reference
// RFC Editor: Remove this line and replace
Hi Andy,
Which convention are you referring to?
What is cited here are excerpt from RFC8407.
Cheers,
Med
De : Andy Bierman
Envoyé : vendredi 7 avril 2023 17:36
À : RFC Errata System
Cc : BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET ; netmod@ietf.org
Objet : Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8407 (7416)
Hi,
Hi,
This errata cites a documentation convention that was created after RFC
8407 was published.
It is unfortunate that this RFC is an ad-hoc mix of YANG Usage Guidelines
and IETF Documentation Guidelines. The latter is much less stable.
Andy
On Fri, Apr 7, 2023 at 5:50 AM RFC Errata System
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8407,
"Guidelines for Authors and Reviewers of Documents Containing YANG Data Models".
--
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7416
