Thanks Jurgen.
I agree, I have rejected this errata.
Regards,
Rob
> -Original Message-
> From: Jürgen Schönwälder
> Sent: 29 July 2022 17:21
> To: RFC Errata System
> Cc: war...@kumari.net; Rob Wilton (rwilton) ;
> kent+i...@watsen.net; joe...@bogus.com; lber...@labn.net;
>
Since the ipv4-address-no-zone type is derived from the ipv4-address
type and the ipv4-address type has the detailed pattern, there is no
need to repeat the details. An ipv4-address value has to satisfy both
the ipv4-address-no-zone pattern and the ipv4-address pattern.
I believe this errata
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6991,
"Common YANG Data Types".
--
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7062
--
Type: Technical
Reported by: Mazhar Rana
