Re: [netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7950 (4916)

2017-01-25 Thread Ladislav Lhotka
> On 25 Jan 2017, at 15:09, Benoit Claise wrote: > > Dear all, > > This looks correct to me according to section 7.17.1 > Need one more pair of eyes to double-check before approving. Yes, it is correct, and also in agreement with the ABNF. Lada > > Regards, Benoit >> The following errata re

Re: [netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7950 (4916)

2017-01-25 Thread Benoit Claise
Dear all, This looks correct to me according to section 7.17.1 Need one more pair of eyes to double-check before approving. Regards, Benoit The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7950, "The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language". -- You may review t

[netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7950 (4916)

2017-01-24 Thread RFC Errata System
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7950, "The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language". -- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7950&eid=4916 -- Type: Technical Re