gt;> À : 'Jürgen Schönwälder' ;
>> 'Rob Wilton (rwilton)' ;
>> 'netmod@ietf.org'
>> Cc : 'Kathleen Moriarty' ;
>> 'Stephan Wenger' ; 'trust...@ietf.org'
>> ; 'Deen, Glenn' ; 'The
>> IESG'
>> Objet : RE: [netmod] [Trustees] draft-moriarty-yangsecuritytext vs
>&
;
> 'Rob Wilton (rwilton)' ;
> 'netmod@ietf.org'
> Cc : 'Kathleen Moriarty' ;
> 'Stephan Wenger' ; 'trust...@ietf.org'
> ; 'Deen, Glenn' ; 'The
> IESG'
> Objet : RE: [netmod] [Trustees] draft-moriarty-yangsecuritytext vs
> errata
>
> Hi Jürgen, all,
>
> I st
avril 2023 19:36
> > To: BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET
>
> > Cc: Rob Wilton (rwilton) ;
> > Kathleen Moriarty ; Stephan
> Wenger
> > ; trust...@ietf.org; netmod@ietf.org; Deen,
> Glenn
> > ; The IESG
> > Subject: Re: [netmod] [Trustees] draft-moriarty-yangsec
Schönwälder , Rob Wilton (rwilton)
, Kathleen Moriarty
, Stephan Wenger ,
trust...@ietf.org , netmod@ietf.org , Deen,
Glenn , The IESG
Subject: Re: [netmod] [Trustees] draft-moriarty-yangsecuritytext vs errata
On Thu, Apr 6, 2023 at 4:09 AM tom petch
mailto:ie...@btconnect.com>> wrote
> >
> > From: netmod On Behalf Of Rob Wilton (rwilton)
> > Sent: mercredi 5 avril 2023 14:17
> > To: Kathleen Moriarty ; Stephan
> Wenger
> > Cc: trust...@ietf.org; netmod@ietf.org; Jürgen Schönwälder
> ; Deen, Glenn <
> glenn_d...@comcast.com>; The IESG
> >
r-netmod-iana-registries/.
>
> Cheers,
> Med
>
> From: netmod On Behalf Of Rob Wilton (rwilton)
> Sent: mercredi 5 avril 2023 14:17
> To: Kathleen Moriarty ; Stephan Wenger
>
> Cc: trust...@ietf.org; netmod@ietf.org; Jürgen Schönwälder
> ; Deen, Glenn
> ; The IES
; Deen, Glenn ; The IESG
> Subject: Re: [netmod] [Trustees] draft-moriarty-yangsecuritytext
> vs errata
>
> I am a pessimist when it comes to IETF time plans and the ability
> to limit discussions to certain issues once a document goes
> through a working group process. I also
> Cc: trust...@ietf.org; netmod@ietf.org; Jürgen Schönwälder
> ; Deen, Glenn
> ; The IESG
> Subject: Re: [netmod] [Trustees] draft-moriarty-yangsecuritytext vs errata
>
> Hi Kathleen,
>
> The short answer to your question is maybe. The longer answer is my email
> repl
sed errata so that it can reviewed/discussed.
Regards,
Rob
From: Kathleen Moriarty
Sent: 04 April 2023 19:14
To: Stephan Wenger
Cc: Rob Wilton (rwilton) ; Jürgen Schönwälder
; Joel Halpern ;
Deen, Glenn ; trust...@ietf.org; netmod@ietf.org; The
IESG
Subject: Re: [netmod] [Trustees] dra
: mercredi 5 avril 2023 14:17
To: Kathleen Moriarty ; Stephan Wenger
Cc: trust...@ietf.org; netmod@ietf.org; Jürgen Schönwälder
; Deen, Glenn ;
The IESG
Subject: Re: [netmod] [Trustees] draft-moriarty-yangsecuritytext vs errata
Hi Kathleen,
The short answer to your question is maybe. The longer
> On Apr 5, 2023, at 08:17, Rob Wilton (rwilton)
> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Kathleen,
>
> The short answer to your question is maybe.
I do hope we will do something as I agree with your problem statement and would
like to see a fix. Perhaps a topic for the retreat.
> The longer answer is my
: Kathleen Moriarty
Sent: 04 April 2023 19:14
To: Stephan Wenger
Cc: Rob Wilton (rwilton) ; Jürgen Schönwälder
; Joel Halpern ;
Deen, Glenn ; trust...@ietf.org; netmod@ietf.org; The
IESG
Subject: Re: [netmod] [Trustees] draft-moriarty-yangsecuritytext vs errata
Rob,
Multiple instances could
lenn
> , trust...@ietf.org ,
> netmod@ietf.org , The IESG
> Subject: RE: [netmod] [Trustees] draft-moriarty-yangsecuritytext vs errata
>
> Hi Stephan, Joel,
>
> I'm basically coming at this from a similar position as Jürgen.
>
> I regard RFC 8407 as providing general guida
...@ietf.org ,
netmod@ietf.org , The IESG
Subject: RE: [netmod] [Trustees] draft-moriarty-yangsecuritytext vs errata
Hi Stephan, Joel,
I'm basically coming at this from a similar position as Jürgen.
I regard RFC 8407 as providing general guidance to authors of YANG modules both
within
age-
> From: Jürgen Schönwälder
> Sent: 04 April 2023 16:43
> To: Stephan Wenger
> Cc: Joel Halpern ; Rob Wilton (rwilton)
> ; Kathleen Moriarty ;
> Deen, Glenn ; trust...@ietf.org;
> netmod@ietf.org; The IESG
> Subject: Re: [netmod] [Trustees] draft-moriarty-yangsecurit
We can consider this an editing error since we forgot to put markers
around the boilerplate. Nobody likely understood that these markers,
which were originally introduced for code components and to support
tools, have second legal meaning. This is for me the more subtle news
that likely more
Hi,
Whether to use an erratum as a mechanism to address our little problem is not
the Trust’s business, and I think the Trust doesn’t and shouldn’t care—after
all, an accepted erratum is an integral part of the (modified) RFC.
However, as an IETF participant I have to ask: Is using errata to
Thank you, Joel!
Haha
Sent from my mobile device
> On Apr 3, 2023, at 5:03 PM, Joel Halpern wrote:
>
> s/with the need/without the need/ (don't you love typos that reverse
> meaning?)
>
> Yours,
>
> Joel
>
>> On 4/3/2023 4:14 PM, Kathleen Moriarty wrote:
>> Hello Rob!
>>
>> Thank you
s/with the need/without the need/ (don't you love typos that reverse
meaning?)
Yours,
Joel
On 4/3/2023 4:14 PM, Kathleen Moriarty wrote:
Hello Rob!
Thank you for your offer of AD sponsorship. We also reviewed the idea of using
errata and I think this was viewed as cleaner in that it would
19 matches
Mail list logo
