On 2018. 11. 28. 16:43, Robert Wilton wrote:
On 28/11/2018 15:32, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 03:27:26PM +, Robert Wilton wrote:
On 28/11/2018 10:20, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 09:41:12AM +, Balázs Lengyel wrote:
I do not buy this s
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 03:43:01PM +, Robert Wilton wrote:
>
> > >
> > I do not understand why a datastore leaf is not sufficient and why we
> > need yet something new. If ever needed, NMDA does allow us to define
> > new datastores.
>
> Because a distinction between "candidate" vs "running"
On 28/11/2018 15:32, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 03:27:26PM +, Robert Wilton wrote:
On 28/11/2018 10:20, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 09:41:12AM +, Balázs Lengyel wrote:
I do not buy this story. Your software needs to decide somehow wha
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 03:27:26PM +, Robert Wilton wrote:
>
> On 28/11/2018 10:20, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 09:41:12AM +, Balázs Lengyel wrote:
> > > > I do not buy this story. Your software needs to decide somehow what
> > > > instance data means. A config
On 28/11/2018 10:20, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 09:41:12AM +, Balázs Lengyel wrote:
I do not buy this story. Your software needs to decide somehow what
instance data means. A config true leaf in candidate means something
different than the same config true leaf in
Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
[...]
> PS: I am not a big fan of the indentation style but that is a minor
> issue.
Since the RFC editor will ensure that the indentation style is
consistent with other RFCs, it is better to fix this now.
/martin
_
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 05:11:07PM +, Balázs Lengyel wrote:
> Hello Jurgen,
>
> As we had many misunderstandings around the datastore parameter, and I am
> still not clear what you would like, could you propose a description text
> for the datastore parameter.
>
Here is a start...
OLD
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 09:41:12AM +, Balázs Lengyel wrote:
>
> > I do not buy this story. Your software needs to decide somehow what
> > instance data means. A config true leaf in candidate means something
> > different than the same config true leaf in running and this yet again
> > means so
On 2018. 11. 23. 16:49, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 01:21:23PM +, Balázs Lengyel wrote:
BALAZS: "Instance data associated with a datastore" may mean many things,
that's why this relatively loose term is used. It may mean:
* Data was read from that dat
Hello Jurgen,
As we had many misunderstandings around the datastore parameter, and I
am still not clear what you would like, could you propose a description
text for the datastore parameter.
regards Balazs
On 2018. 11. 23. 16:49, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 01:21:23
On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 01:21:23PM +, Balázs Lengyel wrote:
>BALAZS: "Instance data associated with a datastore" may mean many things,
>that's why this relatively loose term is used. It may mean:
>
> * Data was read from that datastore
> * Data is intended to be fed into that
BALAZS: "Instance data associated with a datastore" may mean many
things, that's why this relatively loose term is used. It may
mean:
Data was read from that datastore
Data is intended to be fed into that datastore
Someth
12 matches
Mail list logo
