Re: [netmod] Fwd: Multiple deviations with same target

2016-04-29 Thread Benoit Claise
On 4/29/2016 11:27 AM, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: Right, I think it goes pretty much without saying, so this sentence is >IMO unnecessary. > Apparently, this was not clear to every reader and hence the proposal to add this sentence in order to make this explicit. This is a always a good

Re: [netmod] Fwd: Multiple deviations with same target

2016-04-29 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 10:18:15AM +0200, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > Andy Bierman writes: > > > On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 12:15 PM, Juergen Schoenwaelder < > > j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de> wrote: > > > >> On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 11:26:36AM +0100, Juergen Schoenwaelder

Re: [netmod] Fwd: Multiple deviations with same target

2016-04-28 Thread Andy Bierman
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 12:15 PM, Juergen Schoenwaelder < j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 11:26:36AM +0100, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 12:42:27PM +0100, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: > > > So perhaps the proposal is to add > >

Re: [netmod] Fwd: Multiple deviations with same target

2016-04-28 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 11:26:36AM +0100, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 12:42:27PM +0100, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: > > So perhaps the proposal is to add > > > > After applying all deviations announced by a server, in any order, > > the resulting data model

Re: [netmod] Fwd: Multiple deviations with same target

2016-02-16 Thread Martin Bjorklund
Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 09:00:33AM +0100, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Balazs Lengyel wrote: > > > Hello, > > > IMHO the case, when 2 deviation statements point at the same target > > >

Re: [netmod] Fwd: Multiple deviations with same target

2016-02-16 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 09:00:33AM +0100, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > Hi, > > Balazs Lengyel wrote: > > Hello, > > IMHO the case, when 2 deviation statements point at the same target should > > be > > clarified and declared as an error or implementation dependent

Re: [netmod] Fwd: Multiple deviations with same target

2016-02-08 Thread Ladislav Lhotka
> On 08 Feb 2016, at 12:28, Balazs Lengyel wrote: > > Hello, > IMHO the case, when 2 deviation statements point at the same target should be > clarified and declared as an error or implementation dependent feature. I see > no good way of deciding which deviation