FYI.
Regards, B.
-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: New Liaison Statement, "Liaison to IETF on IP Services
Approved Draft 1"
Date: Wed, 3 May 2017 08:24:58 -0700
From: Liaison Statement Management Tool <l...@ietf.org>
To: Benoit Claise <bcla...@cisco.com>, Alvaro Retana
<aret...@cisco.com>, Alia Atlas <akat...@gmail.com>, Deborah Brungard
<db3...@att.com>, Warren Kumari <war...@kumari.net>
CC: Alvaro Retana <aret...@cisco.com>, Deborah Brungard
<db3...@att.com>, n...@mef.net, Alia Atlas <akat...@gmail.com>, Warren
Kumari <war...@kumari.net>, The IETF Chair <ch...@ietf.org>,
sste...@pccwglobal.com, rra...@ciena.com, Benoit Claise
<bcla...@cisco.com>, Raghu Ranganathan <rra...@ciena.com>
Title: Liaison to IETF on IP Services Approved Draft 1
Submission Date: 2017-05-03
URL of the IETF Web page: https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1521/
From: Raghu Ranganathan <rra...@ciena.com>
To: Warren Kumari <war...@kumari.net>,Benoit Claise <bcla...@cisco.com>,Alia Atlas
<akat...@gmail.com>,Alvaro Retana <aret...@cisco.com>,Deborah Brungard <db3...@att.com>
Cc: Alvaro Retana <aret...@cisco.com>,Deborah Brungard <db3...@att.com>,Alia Atlas
<akat...@gmail.com>,Warren Kumari <war...@kumari.net>,The IETF Chair <ch...@ietf.org>,Benoit Claise
<bcla...@cisco.com>,Raghu Ranganathan <rra...@ciena.com>
Response Contacts: rra...@ciena.com, n...@mef.net, sste...@pccwglobal.com
Technical Contacts:
Purpose: For information
Body: Following our previous liaisons, we would like to update you on the
progress of the MEF IP Service Attributes project. A new Approved Draft of our
specification for IP Service Attributes for Subscriber Services is available,
which can be accessed as described below. Note that a corresponding
specification for IP Service Attributes for Operator Services is in progress
but an Approved Draft is not yet available.
In the course of our work, we have reviewed some of the internet drafts from the L3SM
working group that preceded publication of RFC 8049 ("Yang Data Model for L3VPN
Service Delivery"), and we used this as input to our specification. Now that RFC
8049 is published, we intend to review it again to ensure our work remains aligned. We
would appreciate your review of our Approved Draft, and in particular any assistance you
can give in identifying areas where it may conflict or be otherwise misaligned with RFC
8049.
Note that the scope of the current IP Service Attributes project does not
include definition of a yang module; however, we expect that a future project
will include specification of a yang module based on the service attributes
defined in this document. It is our hope that such a module can be defined as
an augment of the module defined in RFC 8049.
MEF’s liaison partners may access all MEF approved drafts as follows:
https://mef.net/liaison-login
Username: mef
Password: M3F3030
The next MEF meetings are:
July 24 - 27, Toronto, Canada
October 23 - 26, Raleigh, USA
Attachments:
L00263_001_LiaisontoIETFonIPServicesApprovedDraft1_Ball_Ranganathan.pdf
https://www.ietf.org/lib/dt/documents/LIAISON/liaison-2017-05-03-mef-ops-rtg-liaison-to-ietf-on-ip-services-approved-draft-1-attachment-1.pdf
.
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
