Hi Qiufang,
Thanks for the comments.
Please see inline.
Cheers,
Med
De : maqiufang (A)
Envoyé : jeudi 29 février 2024 07:29
À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET ; Kent Watsen
Cc : netmod@ietf.org; netmod-cha...@ietf.org
Objet : RE: [netmod] Next steps for draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis
Hi, Med
Jan Lindblad writes:
Med, author team,
Thank you for taking the time to get this work done, and well done!
This is one of those fundamental bricks that saves time and improves
quality for the entire YANG community.
I read the -09 version and like what I see. I have a couple of minor
Hi, Med, Kent, all
2) In the Security Considerations section, the template should be amended to
have the following paragraph:
Please be aware that this YANG module uses groupings from other
YANG
modules that define nodes that may be considered sensitive or
On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 6:30 PM Qin Wu
wrote:
> + In section 4.2 about choice of prefixes, it is said that "Prefix values
> SHOULD be short but are also likely to be unique." I used to say the same
> thing. In recent years, however, I have started to stress the importance of
> uniqueness much
+ In section 4.2 about choice of prefixes, it is said that "Prefix values
SHOULD be short but are also likely to be unique." I used to say the same
thing. In recent years, however, I have started to stress the importance of
uniqueness much more. I'd say something like "Prefix values SHOULD be
Hi Kent,
Please see inline.
Cheers,
Med
De : Kent Watsen
Envoyé : mercredi 28 février 2024 16:35
À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET
Cc : netmod@ietf.org; netmod-cha...@ietf.org
Objet : Re: [netmod] Next steps for draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis
Hi Med,
I’ve been slow to provide follow-up
Hi Jan,
> On Feb 28, 2024, at 9:21 AM, Jan Lindblad wrote:
>
> Med, author team,
>
> Thank you for taking the time to get this work done, and well done! This is
> one of those fundamental bricks that saves time and improves quality for the
> entire YANG community.
>
> I read the -09 version
Hi Med,
I’ve been slow to provide follow-up responses to you regarding the "Adherence
to the NMDA" and "Security Considerations" sections, which I have refined even
more since our last interactions here.
1) In the Adherence to the NMDA section, I know that I pushed before to invert
the
Med, author team,
Thank you for taking the time to get this work done, and well done! This is one
of those fundamental bricks that saves time and improves quality for the entire
YANG community.
I read the -09 version and like what I see. I have a couple of minor
suggestions you might
Hi all,
I think that this version is ready for the WGLC.
The document fully covers the items promised when requesting adoption [1]. As
listed in the ACK section, we also solicited and integrated feedback from many
yangdoctors, solicited SAAG WG to review the security text, etc. Refer to 1.1
10 matches
Mail list logo
