On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 05:26:17PM +, tom petch wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Juergen Schoenwaelder"
> Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2018 5:43 PM
>
> > Well, make sure you send your comments to softwire since they have to
> > sort this out.
>
> Indeed.
>
> The subtext to my
- Original Message -
From: "Juergen Schoenwaelder"
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2018 5:43 PM
> Well, make sure you send your comments to softwire since they have to
> sort this out.
Indeed.
The subtext to my query was that if this had had aYANG doctor review,
which I assumed it would ha
Are YD reviews optional for IETF YANG modules? I assumed it was mandatory.
On 2018-10-03, 12:11 PM, "netmod on behalf of tom petch"
wrote:
I wonder if anyone else on this list has looked at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-softwire-yang/
currently in IETF Last Call.
Well, make sure you send your comments to softwire since they have to
sort this out.
/js
On Wed, Oct 03, 2018 at 04:11:13PM +, tom petch wrote:
> I wonder if anyone else on this list has looked at
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-softwire-yang/
> currently in IETF Last Call.
>
I wonder if anyone else on this list has looked at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-softwire-yang/
currently in IETF Last Call.
It provides management for three tunnel types, Lw4o6, MAP-E and MAP-T
betweeen CPE and Border Relay. It defines a CPE module, a BR module and
a module of com
