Server Instance Data"? (open to suggestions!)
Kent
-Original Message-
From: netmod on behalf of Balázs Lengyel
Date: Tuesday, October 9, 2018 at 11:06 AM
To: Martin Bjorklund
Cc: "netmod-cha...@ietf.org" , "netmod@ietf.org"
Subject: Re: [netmod] WG ado
On Tue, Oct 09, 2018 at 05:07:06PM +, Kent Watsen wrote:
>
> As co-chair, I have two minds:
>
> 1) requests a fix and redo the adoption poll
> 2) realize that it's a living doc and regardless
> how it begins, the WG can sort it out in time.
> i.e., we're adopting to work on the
f of Balázs Lengyel
Date: Tuesday, October 9, 2018 at 11:06 AM
To: Martin Bjorklund
Cc: "netmod-cha...@ietf.org" , "netmod@ietf.org"
Subject: Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll - instance-data
OK, If the chairs are happy with that, I can update the document before
I store it as an off
I would expect that there are many other alternative uses of YANG
instance data.
Some possible alternatives that I can think of:
- Storing the configuration of a device at some point in time to a file,
e.g. for archive or audit purposes.
- Storing diagnostics data, if the format of the data was
OK, If the chairs are happy with that, I can update the document before
I store it as an official netmod document.
regards Balazs
On 2018. 10. 09. 14:25, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
Hi,
Balázs Lengyel wrote:
Hello Martin,
I agree that this document shall be about defining the file format,
and
Hi,
Balázs Lengyel wrote:
> Hello Martin,
>
> I agree that this document shall be about defining the file format,
> and server capabilities shall only be a use-case.)
>
> I already took out a lot of text, that explicitly recommended using
> instance data for documenting capabilities. Server cap
Hello Martin,
I agree that this document shall be about defining the file format,
and server capabilities shall only be a use-case.)
I already took out a lot of text, that explicitly recommended using
instance data for documenting capabilities. Server capabilities are only
mentioned in the intr
