All,
This draft is adopted. Authors, please republish as
draft-ietf-netmod-sub-intf-vlan-model-00 as being the only change.
Thank you,
Lou
PS my apologies for not sending this last month.
On 12/12/2016 6:31 PM, Lou Berger wrote:
> All,
>
> This is start of a two week* poll on making
>
ture looks like it is redundant in this case and
should be removed.
Thanks,
Rob
Alex
From: netmod on behalf of Lou Berger
Sent: Tuesday, 13 December 2016 12:31 p.m.
To: NetMod WG
Cc: NetMod WG Chairs
Subject: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-wil
__
From: netmod on behalf of Lou Berger
Sent: Tuesday, 13 December 2016 12:31 p.m.
To: NetMod WG
Cc: NetMod WG Chairs
Subject: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-wilton-netmod-intf-vlan-yang-04
All,
This is start of a two week* poll on making
draft-wilton-netmod-intf-vlan-yang-04 a NetMo
Hi Robert,
> On 20 Dec 2016, at 15:44, Robert Wilton wrote:
>
> Hi Giles,
>
> Thanks for the support, and comments.
>
> On 19/12/2016 19:37, Giles Heron wrote:
>> support
>>
>> a couple of quick Qs for the authors:
>>
>> 1) is there a reason why you have the “tags” container in the L3 interf
Hi Giles,
Thanks for the support, and comments.
On 19/12/2016 19:37, Giles Heron wrote:
support
a couple of quick Qs for the authors:
1) is there a reason why you have the “tags” container in the L3 interface but
don’t have equivalents in the flexible encapsulation model? since the “tags”
support
a couple of quick Qs for the authors:
1) is there a reason why you have the “tags” container in the L3 interface but
don’t have equivalents in the flexible encapsulation model? since the “tags”
container is the only thing inside the enclosing “vlan” container I’m not sure
it’s require
Sent: Friday, December 16, 2016 4:14 AM
To: Iftekhar Hussain; Lou Berger; NetMod WG
Cc: NetMod WG Chairs; draft-wilton-netmod-intf-vlan-y...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-wilton-netmod-intf-vlan-yang-04
Hi Iftekhar,
Thanks for the comments and support, please see inline
d WG
Cc: NetMod WG Chairs
Subject: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-wilton-netmod-intf-vlan-yang-04
All,
This is start of a two week* poll on making
draft-wilton-netmod-intf-vlan-yang-04 a NetMod working group document.
Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/d
, I don't see any.
Thanks,
Iftekhar
-Original Message-
From: netmod [mailto:netmod-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Lou Berger
Sent: Monday, December 12, 2016 3:32 PM
To: NetMod WG
Cc: NetMod WG Chairs
Subject: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-wilton-netmod-intf-vlan-yang-04
All,
This is start
Support.
> On Dec 12, 2016, at 3:31 PM, Lou Berger wrote:
>
> All,
>
> This is start of a two week* poll on making
> draft-wilton-netmod-intf-vlan-yang-04 a NetMod working group
> document.
>
> Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not
> support". If indicating no,
Support.
Thanks,
Acee
On 12/12/16, 6:31 PM, "netmod on behalf of Lou Berger"
wrote:
>All,
>
>This is start of a two week* poll on making
>draft-wilton-netmod-intf-vlan-yang-04 a NetMod working group
>document.
>
>Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not
>support". I
I have read this document, and I support to adopt it.
Best Regards!
-Michael
-邮件原件-
发件人: netmod [mailto:netmod-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Lou Berger
发送时间: 2016年12月13日 7:32
收件人: NetMod WG
抄送: NetMod WG Chairs
主题: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-wilton-netmod-intf-vlan-yang-04
All,
This is
Support. Lada
> On 13 Dec 2016, at 00:31, Lou Berger wrote:
>
> All,
>
> This is start of a two week* poll on making
> draft-wilton-netmod-intf-vlan-yang-04 a NetMod working group
> document.
>
> Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not
> support". If indicating no
All,
This is start of a two week* poll on making
draft-wilton-netmod-intf-vlan-yang-04 a NetMod working group
document.
Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not
support". If indicating no, please state your reservations with the
document. If yes, please also feel fre
14 matches
Mail list logo
