Re: [netmod] draft-bjorklund-netmod-structural-mount: Namespace issues

2016-04-11 Thread chopps
Martin Bjorklund writes: > wrote: >> Ladislav Lhotka writes: >> > I think we need to eliminate all kinds of recursive mount, so this >> > should not happen. >> >> While I think I need more help understanding the original problem (maybe >> more explicit example of where the conflict is?), I want

Re: [netmod] draft-bjorklund-netmod-structural-mount: Namespace issues

2016-04-09 Thread Martin Bjorklund
wrote: > > Ladislav Lhotka writes: > > > Hi Anton, > > > > Anton Tkáčik writes: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> if I understand correctly netmod-structural-mount inlines "mounted" data > >> directly to container / list which is used, > >> > >> which brings up following issues: > >> > >> > >> 1. It is

Re: [netmod] draft-bjorklund-netmod-structural-mount: Namespace issues

2016-04-08 Thread chopps
Ladislav Lhotka writes: > Hi Anton, > > Anton Tkáčik writes: > >> Hi, >> >> if I understand correctly netmod-structural-mount inlines "mounted" data >> directly to container / list which is used, >> >> which brings up following issues: >> >> >> 1. It is possible to have identifier conflict bet

Re: [netmod] draft-bjorklund-netmod-structural-mount: Namespace issues

2016-03-24 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 02:47:33PM +0100, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > > > On 24 Mar 2016, at 14:13, Juergen Schoenwaelder > > wrote: > > > > On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 12:56:40PM +0100, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > >> Martin Bjorklund writes: > >> > >>> The fact that anydata can represent "really anyth

Re: [netmod] draft-bjorklund-netmod-structural-mount: Namespace issues

2016-03-24 Thread Ladislav Lhotka
> On 24 Mar 2016, at 14:13, Juergen Schoenwaelder > wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 12:56:40PM +0100, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: >> Martin Bjorklund writes: >> >>> The fact that anydata can represent "really anything" does not mean >>> that every server MUST allow the client to create "really

Re: [netmod] draft-bjorklund-netmod-structural-mount: Namespace issues

2016-03-24 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 12:56:40PM +0100, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > Martin Bjorklund writes: > > > The fact that anydata can represent "really anything" does not mean > > that every server MUST allow the client to create "really anything" > > for all anydata config nodes. It will depend on the se

Re: [netmod] draft-bjorklund-netmod-structural-mount: Namespace issues

2016-03-24 Thread Ladislav Lhotka
Martin Bjorklund writes: > Ladislav Lhotka wrote: >> Hi Anton, >> >> Anton Tkáčik writes: >> >> > Hi, >> > >> > if I understand correctly netmod-structural-mount inlines "mounted" data >> > directly to container / list which is used, >> > >> > which brings up following issues: >> > >> > >> >

Re: [netmod] draft-bjorklund-netmod-structural-mount: Namespace issues

2016-03-23 Thread Martin Bjorklund
Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > Hi Anton, > > Anton Tkáčik writes: > > > Hi, > > > > if I understand correctly netmod-structural-mount inlines "mounted" data > > directly to container / list which is used, > > > > which brings up following issues: > > > > > > 1. It is possible to have identifier conf

Re: [netmod] draft-bjorklund-netmod-structural-mount: Namespace issues

2016-03-23 Thread Ladislav Lhotka
Hi Anton, Anton Tkáčik writes: > Hi, > > if I understand correctly netmod-structural-mount inlines "mounted" data > directly to container / list which is used, > > which brings up following issues: > > > 1. It is possible to have identifier conflict between data from model > defining mount and

[netmod] draft-bjorklund-netmod-structural-mount: Namespace issues

2016-03-21 Thread Anton Tkáčik
Hi, if I understand correctly netmod-structural-mount inlines "mounted" data directly to container / list which is used, which brings up following issues: 1. It is possible to have identifier conflict between data from model defining mount and mounted data (if mounted schema contains same m