Hi,
I think we are basically in agreement, and we will update the text. (As
Eric mentioned, I am currently holding the edit token.)
One comment re: call-home. I don’t think anything else is needed here,
really; clearly call-home is something we had in mind all along for
configured
Hi Walker,
Thanks. Some thoughts added. See: <:Eric:>
From: Zhengguangying, May 8, 2017 4:18 AM
Hi Eric, Alex
Thanks for your your excellent response, for some doubt I have add small
items inline .
Walker
From: Eric Voit (evoit) [mailto:ev...@cisco.com]
Sent: 2017年5月3日 21:57
To:
Hi Eric, Alex
Thanks for your your excellent response, for some doubt I have add small
items inline .
Walker
From: Eric Voit (evoit) [mailto:ev...@cisco.com]
Sent: 2017年5月3日 21:57
To: Alexander Clemm; Zhengguangying (Walker)
Cc: netc...@ietf.org; netmod@ietf.org
Subject: RE: hi Alex, Eric
Hi Walker,
Thanks very much for the comments. Some thoughts in-line.
From: Zhengguangying (Walker), May 2, 2017 9:25 AM
Hi Alex, Eric and all,
I reviewed the latest Draft and have some comments, please help to confirm,
thanks.
For draft-ietf-netconf-yang-push-06:
1. In section
Hi Alex, Eric and all,
I reviewed the latest Draft and have some comments, please help to confirm,
thanks.
For draft-ietf-netconf-yang-push-06:
1. In section 4.1, the configured subscription receivers not sepcify which
mechnism to connect to client, it's better define clearly,
Hi Walker, thank you for your review and comments, and Eric, for your excellent
response, to which I have little to add except a few small items inline
--- Alex
From: Eric Voit (evoit) [mailto:ev...@cisco.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2017 9:52 AM
To: Zhengguangying (Walker)
On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 9:51 AM, Eric Voit (evoit) wrote:
> Hi Walker,
>
>
>
> Thanks very much for the comments. Some thoughts in-line.
>
>
>
> *From:* Zhengguangying (Walker), May 2, 2017 9:25 AM
>
> Hi Alex, Eric and all,
>
>
>
>I reviewed the latest Draft and have some
(Moving lots of people to 'BCC' so that this thread can traverse NETCONF &
NETMOD filters as Walker originally intended.)
One more comment, see <>
From: Alexander Clemm, May 2, 2017 8:35 PM
Hi Walker, thank you for your review and comments, and Eric, for your excellent
response, to which I