Re: [netmod] hi Alex, Eric and design team guys some comments for YANG-push and subscribed-notifications, please help to confirm

2017-05-09 Thread Alexander Clemm
Hi, I think we are basically in agreement, and we will update the text. (As Eric mentioned, I am currently holding the edit token.) One comment re: call-home. I don’t think anything else is needed here, really; clearly call-home is something we had in mind all along for configured

Re: [netmod] hi Alex, Eric and design team guys some comments for YANG-push and subscribed-notifications, please help to confirm

2017-05-08 Thread Eric Voit (evoit)
Hi Walker, Thanks. Some thoughts added. See: <:Eric:> From: Zhengguangying, May 8, 2017 4:18 AM Hi Eric, Alex Thanks for your your excellent response, for some doubt I have add small items inline . Walker From: Eric Voit (evoit) [mailto:ev...@cisco.com] Sent: 2017年5月3日 21:57 To:

Re: [netmod] hi Alex, Eric and design team guys some comments for YANG-push and subscribed-notifications, please help to confirm

2017-05-08 Thread Zhengguangying (Walker)
Hi Eric, Alex Thanks for your your excellent response, for some doubt I have add small items inline . Walker From: Eric Voit (evoit) [mailto:ev...@cisco.com] Sent: 2017年5月3日 21:57 To: Alexander Clemm; Zhengguangying (Walker) Cc: netc...@ietf.org; netmod@ietf.org Subject: RE: hi Alex, Eric

Re: [netmod] hi Alex, Eric and design team guys some comments for YANG-push and subscribed-notifications, please help to confirm

2017-05-04 Thread Eric Voit (evoit)
Hi Walker, Thanks very much for the comments. Some thoughts in-line. From: Zhengguangying (Walker), May 2, 2017 9:25 AM Hi Alex, Eric and all, I reviewed the latest Draft and have some comments, please help to confirm, thanks. For draft-ietf-netconf-yang-push-06: 1. In section

[netmod] hi Alex, Eric and design team guys some comments for YANG-push and subscribed-notifications, please help to confirm

2017-05-04 Thread Zhengguangying (Walker)
Hi Alex, Eric and all, I reviewed the latest Draft and have some comments, please help to confirm, thanks. For draft-ietf-netconf-yang-push-06: 1. In section 4.1, the configured subscription receivers not sepcify which mechnism to connect to client, it's better define clearly,

Re: [netmod] hi Alex, Eric and design team guys some comments for YANG-push and subscribed-notifications, please help to confirm

2017-05-04 Thread Alexander Clemm
Hi Walker, thank you for your review and comments, and Eric, for your excellent response, to which I have little to add except a few small items inline --- Alex From: Eric Voit (evoit) [mailto:ev...@cisco.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2017 9:52 AM To: Zhengguangying (Walker)

Re: [netmod] hi Alex, Eric and design team guys some comments for YANG-push and subscribed-notifications, please help to confirm

2017-05-04 Thread Andy Bierman
On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 9:51 AM, Eric Voit (evoit) wrote: > Hi Walker, > > > > Thanks very much for the comments. Some thoughts in-line. > > > > *From:* Zhengguangying (Walker), May 2, 2017 9:25 AM > > Hi Alex, Eric and all, > > > >I reviewed the latest Draft and have some

Re: [netmod] hi Alex, Eric and design team guys some comments for YANG-push and subscribed-notifications, please help to confirm

2017-05-03 Thread Eric Voit (evoit)
(Moving lots of people to 'BCC' so that this thread can traverse NETCONF & NETMOD filters as Walker originally intended.) One more comment, see <> From: Alexander Clemm, May 2, 2017 8:35 PM Hi Walker, thank you for your review and comments, and Eric, for your excellent response, to which I