Hi,
I have a suggested minor clarification below.
--
On April 11, 2018 2:47:24 AM Martin Bjorklund wrote:
Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 10:58:00PM +0200, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> Juergen
Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 10:58:00PM +0200, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> > Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 04:15:46PM +0200, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> > > > >
> > > >
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 10:58:00PM +0200, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 04:15:46PM +0200, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Yes, the checksum (which I think is actually a version identifier).
> > > >
Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 04:15:46PM +0200, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> > >
> > > Yes, the checksum (which I think is actually a version identifier).
> > > Anyway, the question is whether a client can draw any conclusions from
> >
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 04:15:46PM +0200, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> >
> > Yes, the checksum (which I think is actually a version identifier).
> > Anyway, the question is whether a client can draw any conclusions from
> > seeing YANG library instances with the same checksum and whether a
> >
Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 03:27:10PM +0200, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> >
> > Ok. I tweaked it to:
> >
> > This document defines a mechanism to add the schema trees defined
> > by a set of YANG modules onto a mount point
On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 03:27:10PM +0200, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
>
> Ok. I tweaked it to:
>
> This document defines a mechanism to add the schema trees defined
> by a set of YANG modules onto a mount point defined in the schema
> tree in some YANG module.
>
Works for me.
> > OK. It
Hi,
Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 02:33:40PM +0200, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thank you for this review! Comments inline.
> >
> > Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> > > Here is my
On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 02:33:40PM +0200, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thank you for this review! Comments inline.
>
> Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> > Here is my review of draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount-09.
> >
> > * Abstract
> >
> >This
Hi,
Thank you for this review! Comments inline.
Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> Here is my review of draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount-09.
>
> * Abstract
>
>This document defines a mechanism to combine YANG modules into the
>schema defined in other
Here is my review of draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount-09.
* Abstract
This document defines a mechanism to combine YANG modules into the
schema defined in other YANG modules.
I do not know what this says - I think this text is confusing. What
does it mean to 'combine' YANG modules? What
11 matches
Mail list logo