> On 08 Jun 2016, at 17:22, Dale R. Worley wrote:
>
> Martin Bjorklund writes:
>> The text for "path" already says:
>>
>> It takes as an argument a
>> string that MUST refer to a leaf or leaf-list node.
>
> Given what the text must mean, that's sufficient for me.
Then it's fine with me, to
Martin Bjorklund writes:
> The text for "path" already says:
>
> It takes as an argument a
> string that MUST refer to a leaf or leaf-list node.
Given what the text must mean, that's sufficient for me.
Ladislav Lhotka writes:
> Which of the two "foo" leaf nodes does the path argument point
wor...@ariadne.com (Dale R. Worley) writes:
> [...]
> Yes, it's difficult to explain, though once one gets the idea, it's
> straightforward enough. The problem I have is that it's not pointed out
> explicitly anywhere. (E.g., Juergen suggests section 9.9.2, but I don't
> see it there.)
>
> The cr
OK, let's bite the bullet:
OLD
The "path" statement, which is a substatement to the "type"
statement, MUST be present if the type is "leafref". It takes as an
argument a string that MUST refer to a leaf or leaf-list node.
The syntax for a path argument is a subset of the XPath abbre
> On 07 Jun 2016, at 18:45, Andy Bierman wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 9:38 AM, Juergen Schoenwaelder
> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 09:08:56AM -0700, Andy Bierman wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 8:52 AM, Juergen Schoenwaelder <
> > j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de> wrote:
On 2016-06-08 09:48, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> Andy Bierman wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 9:38 AM, Juergen Schoenwaelder <
>> j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 09:08:56AM -0700, Andy Bierman wrote:
On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 8:52 AM, Juergen Schoenwael
> On 08 Jun 2016, at 09:51, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
>
> Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 11:26:03AM -0400, Dale R. Worley wrote:
>>> Ladislav Lhotka writes:
"Dale R. Worley" writes:
> A difficulty I have with the current wording is that it doesn't point
> o
Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 11:26:03AM -0400, Dale R. Worley wrote:
> > Ladislav Lhotka writes:
> > > "Dale R. Worley" writes:
> > >> A difficulty I have with the current wording is that it doesn't point
> > >> out the crucial fact about leafref that the XPath expressi
Andy Bierman wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 9:38 AM, Juergen Schoenwaelder <
> j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 09:08:56AM -0700, Andy Bierman wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 8:52 AM, Juergen Schoenwaelder <
> > > j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de
On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 9:38 AM, Juergen Schoenwaelder <
j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 09:08:56AM -0700, Andy Bierman wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 8:52 AM, Juergen Schoenwaelder <
> > j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de> wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Jun 07
On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 09:08:56AM -0700, Andy Bierman wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 8:52 AM, Juergen Schoenwaelder <
> j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 11:26:03AM -0400, Dale R. Worley wrote:
> > > Ladislav Lhotka writes:
> > > > "Dale R. Worley" writ
On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 8:52 AM, Juergen Schoenwaelder <
j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 11:26:03AM -0400, Dale R. Worley wrote:
> > Ladislav Lhotka writes:
> > > "Dale R. Worley" writes:
> > >> A difficulty I have with the current wording is that it doesn't
On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 11:26:03AM -0400, Dale R. Worley wrote:
> Ladislav Lhotka writes:
> > "Dale R. Worley" writes:
> >> A difficulty I have with the current wording is that it doesn't point
> >> out the crucial fact about leafref that the XPath expression can only
> >> select elements that ar
> On 07 Jun 2016, at 17:26, Dale R. Worley wrote:
>
> Ladislav Lhotka writes:
>> "Dale R. Worley" writes:
>>> A difficulty I have with the current wording is that it doesn't point
>>> out the crucial fact about leafref that the XPath expression can only
>>> select elements that are instantiati
Ladislav Lhotka writes:
> "Dale R. Worley" writes:
>> A difficulty I have with the current wording is that it doesn't point
>> out the crucial fact about leafref that the XPath expression can only
>> select elements that are instantiations of one particular data node. I
>> don't know XPath, but
Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> Martin, how close are we to have a final version addressing all the
> review comments we received during the journey through the IESG?
We're shrinking the list of open issues with every iteration of
emails. I will go through the latest comments from the Gen-ART and
"Dale R. Worley" writes:
> A difficulty I have with the current wording is that it doesn't point
> out the crucial fact about leafref that the XPath expression can only
> select elements that are instantiations of one particular data node. I
> don't know XPath, but it seems that that is not a ge
On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 02:06:57PM -0400, Dale R. Worley wrote:
> A difficulty I have with the current wording is that it doesn't point
> out the crucial fact about leafref that the XPath expression can only
> select elements that are instantiations of one particular data node. I
> don't know XPat
On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 11:06 AM, Dale R. Worley wrote:
> A difficulty I have with the current wording is that it doesn't point
> out the crucial fact about leafref that the XPath expression can only
> select elements that are instantiations of one particular data node. I
> don't know XPath, but
A difficulty I have with the current wording is that it doesn't point
out the crucial fact about leafref that the XPath expression can only
select elements that are instantiations of one particular data node. I
don't know XPath, but it seems that that is not a general property of
XPath expressions
On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 04:14:56PM -0400, Dale R. Worley wrote:
> Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> > Also, the text needs to mention leaf-lists. This gives:
> >
> > The leafref type is restricted to the value space of some leaf or
> > leaf-list node in the schema tree and optionally further restric
Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> Also, the text needs to mention leaf-lists. This gives:
>
> The leafref type is restricted to the value space of some leaf or
> leaf-list node in the schema tree and optionally further restricted
> by corresponding instance nodes in the data tree. The "path"
>
> On 30 May 2016, at 12:10, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
>
> Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
>>
>>> On 30 May 2016, at 10:58, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
>>>
On 30 May 2016, at 10:49, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> Martin Bjorklund writes:
>
>> Juergen Sc
Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
>
> > On 30 May 2016, at 10:58, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> On 30 May 2016, at 10:49, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> >>
> >> Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> >>> Martin Bjorklund writes:
> >>>
> Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 10:33:29
> On 30 May 2016, at 10:58, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
>
>>
>> On 30 May 2016, at 10:49, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
>>
>> Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
>>> Martin Bjorklund writes:
>>>
Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 10:33:29AM +0200, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
>> Juerg
> On 30 May 2016, at 10:49, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
>
> Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
>> Martin Bjorklund writes:
>>
>>> Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 10:33:29AM +0200, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
>> On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 05:29:42PM
Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> Martin Bjorklund writes:
>
> > Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> >> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 10:33:29AM +0200, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> >> > Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> >> > > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 05:29:42PM +0200, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > [...]
> >
Martin Bjorklund writes:
> Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
>> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 10:33:29AM +0200, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
>> > Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
>> > > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 05:29:42PM +0200, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
>> > >
>> > > [...]
>> > >
>> > > > This mixes up paths in th
Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
>
> > On 30 May 2016, at 09:43, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> >
> > Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 27 May 2016, at 19:30, t.petch wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> - Original Message -
> >>> From: "Martin Bjorklund"
> >>> To:
> >>> Sent: Monday, May 23, 2016 3:10
> On 30 May 2016, at 09:43, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
>
> Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
>>
>>> On 27 May 2016, at 19:30, t.petch wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> - Original Message -
>>> From: "Martin Bjorklund"
>>> To:
>>> Sent: Monday, May 23, 2016 3:10 PM
This comment from the Gen-ART revi
Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
>
> > On 27 May 2016, at 19:30, t.petch wrote:
> >
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Martin Bjorklund"
> > To:
> > Sent: Monday, May 23, 2016 3:10 PM
> >>
> >> This comment from the Gen-ART review deserves it's own thread.
> >>
> >> gen-art> - section 9
> On 27 May 2016, at 19:30, t.petch wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Martin Bjorklund"
> To:
> Sent: Monday, May 23, 2016 3:10 PM
>>
>> This comment from the Gen-ART review deserves it's own thread.
>>
>> gen-art> - section 9.9
>> gen-art>
>> gen-art>The leafref type i
- Original Message -
From: "Martin Bjorklund"
To:
Sent: Monday, May 23, 2016 3:10 PM
>
> This comment from the Gen-ART review deserves it's own thread.
>
> gen-art> - section 9.9
> gen-art>
> gen-art>The leafref type is used to declare a constraint on the
value space
> gen-art>of
Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
>
> > On 24 May 2016, at 12:04, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> >
> > Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 24 May 2016, at 10:33, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 05:29:42PM +0200, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
>
> On 24 May 2016, at 12:04, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
>
> Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
>>
>>> On 24 May 2016, at 10:33, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
>>>
>>> Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 05:29:42PM +0200, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
[...]
> This mixes up paths
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 12:13:04PM +0200, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 10:33:29AM +0200, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> > > Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> > > > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 05:29:42PM +0200, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> > > >
> > > > [...]
Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 10:33:29AM +0200, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> > Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 05:29:42PM +0200, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> > >
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > > This mixes up paths in the data tree with those in the schema
Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
>
> > On 24 May 2016, at 10:33, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> >
> > Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> >> On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 05:29:42PM +0200, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> >>
> >> [...]
> >>
> >>> This mixes up paths in the data tree with those in the schema
> >>> tree. The X
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 10:33:29AM +0200, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 05:29:42PM +0200, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > This mixes up paths in the data tree with those in the schema tree. The
> > > XPath expression in the "p
> On 24 May 2016, at 10:33, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
>
> Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
>> On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 05:29:42PM +0200, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> This mixes up paths in the data tree with those in the schema tree. The
>>> XPath expression in the "path" statement is
Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 05:29:42PM +0200, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > This mixes up paths in the data tree with those in the schema tree. The
> > XPath expression in the "path" statement is evaluated in the context of a
> > data tree, but if the resul
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 05:29:42PM +0200, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
[...]
> This mixes up paths in the data tree with those in the schema tree. The XPath
> expression in the "path" statement is evaluated in the context of a data
> tree, but if the result is an empty node set, then "this leaf node
Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
>
> > On 23 May 2016, at 16:10, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > This comment from the Gen-ART review deserves it's own thread.
> >
> > gen-art> - section 9.9
> > gen-art>
> > gen-art>The leafref type is used to declare a constraint on the value
> > spa
> On 23 May 2016, at 16:10, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> This comment from the Gen-ART review deserves it's own thread.
>
> gen-art> - section 9.9
> gen-art>
> gen-art>The leafref type is used to declare a constraint on the value
> space
> gen-art>of a leaf, based on a referen
Hi,
This comment from the Gen-ART review deserves it's own thread.
gen-art> - section 9.9
gen-art>
gen-art>The leafref type is used to declare a constraint on the value space
gen-art>of a leaf, based on a reference to a set of leaf instances in the
gen-art>data tree. The "path" subs
45 matches
Mail list logo
