September 13, 2017 12:20 PM
Subject: Re: [netmod] schema mount open issue #1
Hi,
Lou Berger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The LNI/NI authors/RTG Area DT met yesterday and discussed the
proposed
> change as well as the other topics that came up in the subsequent
> discussion. The high order bit
Hi,
Lou Berger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The LNI/NI authors/RTG Area DT met yesterday and discussed the proposed
> change as well as the other topics that came up in the subsequent
> discussion. The high order bit is that the proposed and current
> definitions are adequate for our needs. Read further i
Hi,
The LNI/NI authors/RTG Area DT met yesterday and discussed the proposed
change as well as the other topics that came up in the subsequent
discussion. The high order bit is that the proposed and current
definitions are adequate for our needs. Read further if you care about
details, including
Lou Berger writes:
> On August 29, 2017 9:03:22 AM Per Hedeland wrote:
>
>> On 2017-08-29 14:34, Lou Berger wrote:
>>> On 08/29/2017 03:37 AM, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
Lou Berger wrote:
> Lada,
>
>
> On 8/28/2017 10:16 AM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
>> Lou Berger píae v Po 2
> -Original Message-
> From: netmod [mailto:netmod-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Lou Berger
> Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2017 8:35 AM
> To: Martin Bjorklund
> Cc: netmod@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [netmod] schema mount open issue #1
>
> On 08/29/2017 03:37 AM
FYI I've asked folks in the routing area, i.e., the ietf users of schema
mount, if they have an opinion on the node discussion. I will also do so on
the point I raised on parent reference location. (Which is independent from
your format change.) Clearly, if I'm the only one to be raising objecti
Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> Lou Berger writes:
>
> > Lada,
> >
> >
> > On 8/28/2017 10:16 AM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> >> Lou Berger píše v Po 28. 08. 2017 v 09:40 -0400:
[...]
> >>> PS is your view aligned with martin or our example?
> >> If you mean shifting the XPath context node to the mount
On 2017-08-29 15:40, Lou Berger wrote:
>
>
> On August 29, 2017 9:03:22 AM Per Hedeland wrote:
>
>> On 2017-08-29 14:34, Lou Berger wrote:
>>> On 08/29/2017 03:37 AM, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
Lou Berger wrote:
> Lada,
>
>
> On 8/28/2017 10:16 AM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
Lou Berger writes:
> Lada,
>
>
> On 8/28/2017 10:16 AM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
>> Lou Berger píše v Po 28. 08. 2017 v 09:40 -0400:
>>> Lada,
>>>
>>> On 8/28/2017 9:30 AM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> Can you please take a look at it and see if we have any other disconnects?
This is really sc
On August 29, 2017 9:03:22 AM Per Hedeland wrote:
On 2017-08-29 14:34, Lou Berger wrote:
On 08/29/2017 03:37 AM, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
Lou Berger wrote:
Lada,
On 8/28/2017 10:16 AM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
Lou Berger píae v Po 28. 08. 2017 v 09:40 -0400:
Lada,
On 8/28/2017 9:30 AM,
On 2017-08-29 14:34, Lou Berger wrote:
> On 08/29/2017 03:37 AM, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
>> Lou Berger wrote:
>>> Lada,
>>>
>>>
>>> On 8/28/2017 10:16 AM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
Lou Berger píae v Po 28. 08. 2017 v 09:40 -0400:
> Lada,
>
> On 8/28/2017 9:30 AM, Ladislav Lhotka wrot
For me usage standpoint it really would be much simpler in the model
definition and use for the mount point to behave like a container. What are
your technical objections to this change? Note that the encoding from a
protocol standpoint would be the same as a container.
Thanks
Lou
On August
Lou Berger wrote:
> On 08/29/2017 03:37 AM, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> > Lou Berger wrote:
> >> Lada,
> >>
> >>
> >> On 8/28/2017 10:16 AM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> >>> Lou Berger píše v Po 28. 08. 2017 v 09:40 -0400:
> Lada,
>
> On 8/28/2017 9:30 AM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> >>
On 08/29/2017 03:37 AM, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> Lou Berger wrote:
>> Lada,
>>
>>
>> On 8/28/2017 10:16 AM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
>>> Lou Berger píše v Po 28. 08. 2017 v 09:40 -0400:
Lada,
On 8/28/2017 9:30 AM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
>> Can you please take a look at it and see
Lou Berger wrote:
> Lada,
>
>
> On 8/28/2017 10:16 AM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> > Lou Berger píše v Po 28. 08. 2017 v 09:40 -0400:
> >> Lada,
> >>
> >> On 8/28/2017 9:30 AM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> Can you please take a look at it and see if we have any other
> disconnects?
> >>> Thi
Lada,
On 8/28/2017 10:16 AM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> Lou Berger píše v Po 28. 08. 2017 v 09:40 -0400:
>> Lada,
>>
>> On 8/28/2017 9:30 AM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
Can you please take a look at it and see if we have any other disconnects?
>>> This is really scary.
>> I agree!
>>
>>> How can
Lou Berger píše v Po 28. 08. 2017 v 09:40 -0400:
> Lada,
>
> On 8/28/2017 9:30 AM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> > > Can you please take a look at it and see if we have any other disconnects?
> >
> > This is really scary.
>
> I agree!
>
> > How can we expect poor data modellers to understand the
>
Lada,
On 8/28/2017 9:30 AM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
>> Can you please take a look at it and see if we have any other disconnects?
> This is really scary.
I agree!
> How can we expect poor data modellers to understand the
> concept if we have such fundamental disconnects, after so many hours of
>
Lou Berger píše v Po 28. 08. 2017 v 08:54 -0400:
>
> On 8/28/2017 7:35 AM, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> > Lou Berger wrote:
> > > Martin,
> > > See below.
> > >
> > > On 08/28/2017 06:28 AM, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> > > > Lou Berger wrote:
> > > > > Martin,
> > > > > See below
> > > > >
> > >
On 8/28/2017 7:35 AM, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> Lou Berger wrote:
>> Martin,
>> See below.
>>
>> On 08/28/2017 06:28 AM, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
>>> Lou Berger wrote:
Martin,
See below
On August 23, 2017 2:28:37 AM Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> Lou Berger wr
Lou Berger wrote:
> Martin,
> See below.
>
> On 08/28/2017 06:28 AM, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> > Lou Berger wrote:
> >> Martin,
> >> See below
> >>
> >>
> >> On August 23, 2017 2:28:37 AM Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> >>
> >>> Lou Berger wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> See below.
> >>
Martin,
See below.
On 08/28/2017 06:28 AM, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> Lou Berger wrote:
>> Martin,
>> See below
>>
>>
>> On August 23, 2017 2:28:37 AM Martin Bjorklund wrote:
>>
>>> Lou Berger wrote:
Hi Martin,
See below.
On 8/22/2017 6:20 AM, Martin Bjorklu
Lou Berger wrote:
> Martin,
> See below
>
>
> On August 23, 2017 2:28:37 AM Martin Bjorklund wrote:
>
> > Lou Berger wrote:
> >> Hi Martin,
> >>
> >> See below.
> >>
> >>
> >> On 8/22/2017 6:20 AM, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > Lada presented an open issue in schema mount i
Martin,
See below
On August 23, 2017 2:28:37 AM Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> Lou Berger wrote:
>> Hi Martin,
>>
>> See below.
>>
>>
>> On 8/22/2017 6:20 AM, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Lada presented an open issue in schema mount in Prague. (See slide 6
>> > in
>> >
>> https://da
Lou Berger wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> See below.
>
>
> On 8/22/2017 6:20 AM, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Lada presented an open issue in schema mount in Prague. (See slide 6
> > in
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/99/materials/slides-99-netmod-sessb-schema-mount)
> >
> > The o
Hi Martin,
See below.
On 8/22/2017 6:20 AM, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Lada presented an open issue in schema mount in Prague. (See slide 6
> in
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/99/materials/slides-99-netmod-sessb-schema-mount)
>
> The original problem comes from the NI use case
>
"Acee Lindem (acee)" wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
>
> On 8/22/17, 6:20 AM, "netmod on behalf of Martin Bjorklund"
> wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >Lada presented an open issue in schema mount in Prague. (See slide 6
> >in
> >https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/99/materials/slides-99-netmod-sessb-s
> >chem
Hi Martin,
On 8/22/17, 6:20 AM, "netmod on behalf of Martin Bjorklund"
wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Lada presented an open issue in schema mount in Prague. (See slide 6
>in
>https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/99/materials/slides-99-netmod-sessb-s
>chema-mount)
>
>The original problem comes from the NI us
Hi,
Lada presented an open issue in schema mount in Prague. (See slide 6
in
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/99/materials/slides-99-netmod-sessb-schema-mount)
The original problem comes from the NI use case
(https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-ni-model). In this
use case, interface
29 matches
Mail list logo
