Re: [netmod] structured metadata for schema nodes using YANG extensions

2024-03-14 Thread Jason Sterne (Nokia)
Ok thx. Appreciate the pointer and the ideas. Jason > -Original Message- > From: Martin Björklund > Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2024 4:26 AM > To: Jason Sterne (Nokia) > Cc: netmod@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [netmod] structured metadata for schema nodes using

Re: [netmod] structured metadata for schema nodes using YANG extensions

2024-03-14 Thread Martin Björklund
e argument of an extension, and then also have some way to define the data > model of that instance data as part of the extension definition. > > Jason > > > -Original Message- > > From: Martin Björklund > > Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2024 5:08 AM > > To: Jaso

Re: [netmod] structured metadata for schema nodes using YANG extensions

2024-03-13 Thread Jason Sterne (Nokia)
jörklund > Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2024 5:08 AM > To: Jason Sterne (Nokia) > Cc: netmod@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [netmod] structured metadata for schema nodes using YANG > extensions > > > CAUTION: This is an external email. Please be very careful when clicking

Re: [netmod] structured metadata for schema nodes using YANG extensions

2024-03-13 Thread Martin Björklund
"Jason Sterne \(Nokia\)" wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm looking for information about doing more complex YANG extensions > that the basic type, e.g.: > oc-ext:openconfig-version "2.5.0"; See https://github.com/netmod-wg/yang-next/issues/54 for a discussion about one approach. /martin > >

[netmod] structured metadata for schema nodes using YANG extensions

2024-03-12 Thread Jason Sterne (Nokia)
Hi all, I'm looking for information about doing more complex YANG extensions that the basic type, e.g.: oc-ext:openconfig-version "2.5.0"; The node-tags approach doesn't fit what I'm trying to do (tags can't have values). RFC7950 says the following: The substatements of an extension