In article <80463fd150.r...@user.minijem.plus.com>, Richard
Porter wrote:
> On 29 Dec 2009 rick...@argonet.co.uk wrote:
> > <3e6526d150.wra...@wra1th.plus.com> Gavin Wraith wrote:
> >> NetSurf 9764 appears to grab all the free memory once
> >> it has downloaded http://slashdot.org/ , making it
In message <38ca3ed150.grahamepar...@grahame.parish>
Grahame Parish wrote:
> In message <3e6526d150.wra...@wra1th.plus.com>
> Gavin Wraith wrote:
>> NetSurf 9764 appears to grab all the free memory once it has
>> downloaded http://slashdot.org/ , making it impossible to use.
On 29 Dec 2009 rick...@argonet.co.uk wrote:
> <3e6526d150.wra...@wra1th.plus.com>
> Gavin Wraith wrote:
>> NetSurf 9764 appears to grab all the free memory once it has
>> downloaded http://slashdot.org/ , making it impossible to use.
>> On RO 5.14.
> It isn't just 9764 - the same thin
In message <3e6526d150.wra...@wra1th.plus.com>
Gavin Wraith wrote:
> NetSurf 9764 appears to grab all the free memory once it has
> downloaded http://slashdot.org/ , making it impossible to use.
> On RO 5.14.
Not here it doesn't (9761 at present) - been running since before
midnight a
In message <92c13ad150...@rickman.argonet.co.uk> you wrote:
> > NetSurf 9764 appears to grab all the free memory once it has
> > downloaded http://slashdot.org/ , making it impossible to use.
> > On RO 5.14.
>
> It isn't just 9764 - the same thing happens on the current stable
> release 2.1 (23
<3e6526d150.wra...@wra1th.plus.com>
Gavin Wraith wrote:
> NetSurf 9764 appears to grab all the free memory once it has
> downloaded http://slashdot.org/ , making it impossible to use.
> On RO 5.14.
It isn't just 9764 - the same thing happens on the current stable
release 2.1 (23 may 2
NetSurf 9764 appears to grab all the free memory once it has
downloaded http://slashdot.org/ , making it impossible to use.
On RO 5.14.
--
Gavin Wraith (ga...@wra1th.plus.com)
Home page: http://www.wra1th.plus.com/
