In message
on 6 May 2013 Tony Moore wrote:
>> If you go to http://ci.netsurf-browser.org/builds/riscos/ you will
>> find that the first half of the listed builds are "-jsoff-" and the
>> second half are "-json-"
> I'm aware of that - thank you. The point is that some people choose to
> use the
In message <62523.62.172.88.224.1367871663.squir...@email.orpheusnet.co.uk>
"Learning Partners" wrote:
> I am told 3.1 is sufficiently stable to use - any comment?
The development versions are almost always sufficiently stable to use,
despite the dire warnings.
Keep a history of a few
On Mon, 6 May, 2013 7:09 pm, Gerald Dodson wrote:
> The misunderstanding seems to persist: NS 3.0 does have JS built in.
>
> As I understand things and, as already stated before, JS is disabled when
> you load NS. Menu>Choices>Content takes you to the selection where you can
> enable JS. With 3.0
On 6 May 2013, "Gerald Dodson" wrote:
> The misunderstanding seems to persist: NS 3.0 does have JS built in.
Chris Young, a NetSurf Developer, thinks that it is 'highly likely' that
NetSurf 3.0 was compiled without JS support. Please see message
<51815842.10...@unsatisfactorysoftware.co.uk>
The
The misunderstanding seems to persist: NS 3.0 does have JS built in.
As I understand things and, as already stated before, JS is disabled when
you load NS. Menu>Choices>Content takes you to the selection where you can
enable JS. With 3.0 you will always have to set what you want each time NS
is lo
On 6 May 2013, Andrew Pinder wrote:
> In message <3c58a64753.old_coaster@old_coaster.yahoo.co.uk>
> on 6 May 2013 Tony Moore wrote:
>> > > On 1 May 2013, Chris Young
> > > wrote:
>
> > [snip]
>
> > > > I think it is highly likely that NetSurf 3.0 has been built
> > > > without JavaScript suppor
In message <3c58a64753.old_coaster@old_coaster.yahoo.co.uk>
on 6 May 2013 Tony Moore wrote:
>> On 1 May 2013, Chris Young
>> wrote:
> [snip]
>>> I think it is highly likely that NetSurf 3.0 has been built without
>>> JavaScript support.
> At present, both http://www.riscosopen.org/forum/foru
> On 1 May 2013, Chris Young
> wrote:
[snip]
> > I think it is highly likely that NetSurf 3.0 has been built without
> > JavaScript support.
At present, both http://www.riscosopen.org/forum/forums/1/topics/1847
and the ChangeLog assert that NetSurf 3.0 offers 'early and primitive
JavaScript sup
On 1 May 2013, Chris Young
wrote:
> On 01/05/13 17:45, Tony Moore wrote:
> > On 1 May 2013, Daniel Silverstone
> > wrote:
> > > The JS support in the current builds is very likely to be
> > > identical to the 3.0 build.
> >
> > http://javatester.org/javascript.html responds to NS 3.0 with a
> >
On 01/05/13 17:45, Tony Moore wrote:
On 1 May 2013, Daniel Silverstone wrote:
The JS support in the current builds is very likely to be identical to
the 3.0 build.
http://javatester.org/javascript.html responds to NS 3.0 with a blank
Test Results window, whereas the response to the current 3.
On 1 May 2013, John-Mark Bell wrote:
> On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 04:45:29PM +, Tony Moore wrote:
> > On 1 May 2013, Daniel Silverstone
> > wrote:
> >
> > > As for the 'choices bug' we have no idea what's going on there.
> > > Again I don't think we've touched anything in that yet.
> >
> > There
On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 04:45:29PM +, Tony Moore wrote:
> On 1 May 2013, Daniel Silverstone wrote:
>
> > As for the 'choices bug' we have no idea what's going on there. Again
> > I don't think we've touched anything in that yet.
>
> There has been a discussion of the problem on csa.apps, sev
On 1 May 2013, Daniel Silverstone wrote:
> On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 03:54:40PM +, Tony Moore wrote:
> > If JS is important to you I would suggest downloading the latest
> > development build from http://ci.netsurf-browser.org/builds/riscos/
> > . (choose json at the bottom of the page). The JS
On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 03:54:40PM +, Tony Moore wrote:
> If JS is important to you I would suggest downloading the latest
> development build from http://ci.netsurf-browser.org/builds/riscos/ .
> (choose json at the bottom of the page). The JS choices bug is absent,
> and the JS support itself
On 1 May 2013, "Learning Partners" wrote:
> On Wed, 1 May, 2013 1:01 pm, Tony Moore wrote:
[snip]
> > JS setting in Choices to be lost when NS is quit/re-started. This
> > means that it is necessary to re-set 'Disable JavaScript' when NS
> > 3.0 is run.
>
> Yes am doing that. My problem is with
On 1 May 2013 "Learning Partners" wrote:
> On Wed, 1 May, 2013 1:01 pm, Tony Moore wrote:
>> On 1 May 2013, Peter Young wrote:
Oh, no, I didn't! :-)
>> John mentions the 'new release' which presumably means NS 3.0. Although
>> the javatester response above mentions NetSurf/3.0, the actual re
On Wed, 1 May, 2013 1:01 pm, Tony Moore wrote:
> On 1 May 2013, Peter Young wrote:
> John mentions the 'new release' which presumably means NS 3.0. Although
> the javatester response above mentions NetSurf/3.0, the actual response
> when using the NS 3.0 release, is a blank Test Results window, i
On 1 May 2013, Peter Young wrote:
> On 1 May 2013 "Learning Partners" wrote:
[snip]
> > Can't get javascript to work at all though (ticked on in choices
> > but)
>
> Seems to work here. Have you made sure that you have a JavaScript
> version? :-)
>
> http://javatester.org/javascript.html w
On 1 May 2013 "Learning Partners" wrote:
> The Orpheus Home page does not seem to render correctly on my set up (Iyo
> 5.16). It did on 2.9 - whoops. Does anyone else have the same experience?
Yes, confirmed here (NetSurf #1096, ARMini, RISC OS 5.19). It's
readable, but
The Orpheus Home page does not seem to render correctly on my set up (Iyo
5.16). It did on 2.9 - whoops. Does anyone else have the same experience?
Thanks for work on the new release - text editing is so much improved.
Can't get javascript to work at all though (ticked on in choices but
20 matches
Mail list logo
