Re: actual updates inside !Boot and !System

2011-10-03 Thread Steve Fryatt
On 3 Oct, Richard Porter wrote in message : > On 3 Oct 2011 Jim Nagel wrote: > > > As a frequent updater to the latest test versions of Netsurf, I've often > > wished the developers could supply an extra little Readme to say when > > these supporting items (Iconv, Unicode etc) are actually c

Re: actual updates inside !Boot and !System

2011-10-03 Thread Richard Porter
On 3 Oct 2011 Jim Nagel wrote: > As a frequent updater to the latest test versions of Netsurf, I've > often wished the developers could supply an extra little Readme to say > when these supporting items (Iconv, Unicode etc) are actually changed. Surely NetSurf should RMEnsure the minimum version

Re: actual updates inside !Boot and !System

2011-10-03 Thread Grahame Parish
In message <95466b1c52@nails.abbeypress.net> Jim Nagel wrote: > As a frequent updater to the latest test versions of Netsurf, I've > often wished the developers could supply an extra little Readme to say > when these supporting items (Iconv, Unicode etc) are actually changed. That'

actual updates inside !Boot and !System

2011-10-03 Thread Jim Nagel
John Harrison wrote on Sep23 (in "Netsurf 2.8 released - Thank you!"): > ... it's worth checking whether anything in System or Boot has been > updated as well. In this case it had (judging by the timestamp) so I > merged them as well. > Unicode was the thing that had a recent timestamp. As a freq