[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thu 06/08/06 at 01:38 PM -0700):
> But what really bothers me is this, that the current discussion on the
> nettime list is really about nettime and nettime and nettime...
Exactly.
...and...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thu 06/08/06 at 01:29 PM -0400):
> the effects were fairly obvio
Ronda:
> but the Macy discussions weren't military or a mathematical philosophy.
We've talked about this before . . . that is simply wrong.
Of course they were "military" -- or more specifically a result of the
intersection of "intelligence" interests in the application of social science
and
Roberta:
When nettime was young, it largely revolved around events. Not ideas.
Events. The list was often a discussion of events, publishing of "papers" that
were given at events, reports about events, quarrels that took place at events,
planning for events. Events were at the center of net
Juan Martin Prada's essay reminded me of this talk that Shierry Weber
Nicholsen gave a few years ago and that, to my knowledge, hasn't been
published anywhere. She takes as her starting point Stjepan
Mestrovic's notion of "postemotional society":
"While emotions would seem to be the inviolable he
A note on World Environment Day (June 5) from the UN. Ibeanu's mandate=20
is defined as follows: "The Special Rapporteur on the adverse effects of=20
the illicit movement and dumping of toxic and dangerous products and=20
wastes on the enjoyment of human rights is mandated by the Commission on=20
H
On 9-Jun-06, at 10:38 AM, Felix Stalder wrote:
>
> I agree, on many levels, nettime works quite well, so there is not an
> urgent need to change something. But, this does not mean it cannot be
> improved. Sure it can. But to do that, we need concrete ideas, what
> would you, personally, individuall
Ever wonder who is reading your MySpace profile? Apparently the
Pentagon, amongst others. It's nice to know Edinburgh is hosting
discussions for the benefit of the electronic surveillance community...
>From Stunned weblog:
"What you myspace will be held against you
The New Scientist reveals
Hi everyone,
sorry for my previous post, it went out without being finished. What
I wanted to say was that many of the themes that critical net.culture
talked about 10 years ago are now mainstream. They are now playing
themselves out on a scale far beyond 'net.culture', indeed, they have
> For the sake of clarity Geert are you putting yourself forward for
> all the hard work involved in being part of the next stage in the
> 'rotation'. you are proposing or is this a prompting that others
> rather than yourself should put themselves forward to take up this
> burden ?
No, not at all
