On Sunday, 11. June 2006 02:21, John Hopkins wrote:
In this Light, I would challenge Felix and Ted (and any others
feeling qualified) to write a brief task description of the
(different) roles/positions necessary to run nettime as it is today.
Put it out here. I certainly have some interest,
On Jun 11, 2006, at 5:57 PM, A. G-C wrote:
From this point of view, I think that Geert's provocation on closing
the list to have it reborning from this new time, it is really
interesting as logical activist attitude happening in real time of
the mails against misunderstanding and
Richard:
No I didn't! I was - and still am - a *left* social democrat.
H -- DEJA VU all over again . . . g
http://www.nettime.org/Lists-Archives/nettime-l-9903/msg00138.html
I especially like Ted Byfield's editorial about what belongs on nettime!
[nettime isn't the best venue for
I haven't posted to nettime in what a Slovene friend would no doubt
call the age of a dog, but read it quite regularly and still
consider it a kind of ongoing online cornerstone, and have to say that
my vote (be it worthless for the above reasons, or not), is in kinship
with David Garcia's
At 10:39 AM +0200 6/12/06, David Garcia wrote:
I would argue that any movement for radical change should be carried
out in close collaboration with the moderators and should take a very
different approach and tone from some of the peremptory notifications
we have seen on this thread. And above all
[orig From: some spammer]
Sell your unpaid Judgments
You will feel good when you receive what you are owed and at the same time
you see that justice happens.
Reach us at:
1-___-4 8 0-5712
Claim your money, now
Detailed info or to discontinue receiving or to see our address.
After a
Hi Brian-
Thanks so much for your depthful thoughts, compliments and for the link to
your work. I look forward to reading it.
These ideas come from my dissertation work entitled 'The List Serves: Bare
Life in Open Social Order' which I am getting closer and closer to
completing at Concordia
