On 10/17/14 6:30 AM, d.garcia wrote:
The Morozov article is indeed very misleading. There is nothing in the
New Yorker headline to indicate that this is anything other that an
article full of the ideas and research by Morozov himself.
A headline does not usually have a dual function as a
The New Yorker's dandy Eustace Tilley embodied highbrow journalism.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_New_Yorker
Haughtily disdaining on the cover annually lowbrow rigorous
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fact_checkerfact checking
and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyeditingcopyediting, its
