The point is that it does take place, and that it places severe
constraints on the organization that suffers from it. Whether the
celeb-status is sought as a reward or loathed does not make any
difference. Celeb-status creates a vulnerable focus point for the
organization.
In today's
Opinions invited by statement signers: dueproc...@riseup.net
At 01:19 PM 6/11/2016, you wrote:
no
# distributed via : no commercial use without permission
#is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
# collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
# more info:
https://cryptome.org/2016/06/appelbaum-solidarity.pdf
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Saturday 11th June 2016
We, the undersigned, are a group of women who
have been friends, colleagues, co-workers or
partners of Jacob "Jake" Appelbaum over many years.
We have decided that we must speak out due to
On 10/06/16 20:42, biella wrote:
> The social movement as a whole, like most social movements, are hard to
> structur e (not sure I would want that anyway as social movements are by
> definition transve rsal to any one organization, group, or entity) but
> there are many important examples of
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 02:42:20PM -0400, biella wrote:
> I think it is important to talk about what could have been done
> differently but I don't buy into this argument. There are plenty of
> institutions and organizations in hackerdom that are structured from
> many free software projects
Am 10.06.16 um 18:30 schrieb Frank Rieger:
I do see a large difference between the US and the European scene
though. The "celebrity" problem you diagnosed is most prevalent in the
US. The idea of "rockstar" hackers, programmers etc. has never taken so
much hold in Europe or Germany.
Am
Dear Frank,
thank you for speaking out. I choose to consider your words both as a
personal opinion, and as of a representative of CCC as a whole, althou I
know that there is no such thing as a "collective opinion", specially
within such an anti-authoritatian (& "chaotic" by design)
