Frederic's point certainly rings true to me:
>"A linguistic expression can be an adequate approximation of reality for a
specified context and a specified purpose."
especially as he points out that the scientific/Western Enlightenment
episteme has been significantly hamperred by the low hanging
This may sound far off, but there are wider analogies that may hint to
solutions.
(some) drugs are sanctioned (illegal, regulated) because they have
significant effect on human behavior. Air pollution is regulated because
it adversely affects people. Sex is (more or less) regulated, because
Any topic online or off with the word Heidegger in it may help
terminate neant of the mal mot "existential."
# distributed via : no commercial use without permission
#is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
# collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
# more
[inline]
On 10/20/19, 11:16, Max Herman wrote:
On the first video, I see the danger of making everything instantly
available so to speak online. It removes the role of doing your own
activities, having one's own life, just getting one online. Also the
I think that there is another issue:
@Mar Herman.
Thanks for your relevant thoughts and quotes (Olaf Sporns, Networks of the
Brain, and the Washington Post paper).
In my book Anoptikon, I rely on the research in neuroscience of Guillaume
Dumas & all (Institut Pasteur, Paris), who study experimentally the
influence of level of
