Organized envy sounds like a fair characterization. But the organization
is small and centered on a few friends and associates of Medina. Then
there are others engaging in opportunistic one-offs on Twitter and
Facebook, at various levels of engagement.
It's far from clear that Morozov has "made
On 10/16/14 3:17 PM, t byfield wrote:
Again, Morozov should've done a better job of crediting Medina's work, and
everyone should have been more attentive to the gender aspects. But too
many critics have batted around quantitative-lite factoids -- how many
paragraphs, how many mentions, how many y
On 10/17/14 6:30 AM, d.garcia wrote:
The Morozov article is indeed very misleading. There is nothing in the
New Yorker headline to indicate that this is anything other that an
article full of the ideas and research by Morozov himself.
A headline does not usually have a dual function as a footn
On 10/19/14 3:01 PM, John Hopkins wrote:
On 19/Oct/14 08:53, David Mandl wrote:
It seems clear that the New Yorker is no longer home of the best
fact-checking/copyediting humankind can achieve.
It takes time and energy to impose order on a system. Clearly many many
segments of the 'developed