On 5/29/19 4:48 PM, tbyfield wrote:
> It's merely to note — as we've seen in so many
> other contexts — that TED talks and slapping '2.0' stickers on projects
> tends to blur all the myriad practices that came before it into a gauzy
> '1.0' that's both idealized and denigrated. And to generate de
great artwork!
here i appropriate that by signing it and dual licensing under my
copyright and also dedicating it to the public domain.
by the way, i am satoshi...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
[1]United States Copyright Office
[2]Help [3]New Search
suggesting creative commons to extend the "commercial use" question
is anyone interested in forming a workgroup to develop a proposal for
creative commons to change/extend "Allow commercial uses of your work?"
question during license choice?
i have been having a hard time trying to explain the co
a free letter to cultural institutions digitizing the public domain
material,
please do not enclose the public domain when you digitize the material
that is already in public domain.
give the peers the freedom that you make use of when building on the
public domain and encourage them to build on
.
please mediate building a free/libre culture where everyone is an
artist. do not promote proprietary/permission/fan culture.
http://httpdot.net/txt/AFreeLetterToCulturalInstitutions.txt
--
ozgur k.
gpg:A3E6 57AD E14D 1F66 A546 6101 BA42 0724 E750 C5AE
# distributed via : no commercial use
