Aloha,

Also in shortened version (ict the Pdf version) in this month's issue of Le 
Monde Diplomatique.

original to (for downloading the Pdf): 
https://peacediplomacy.org/2022/06/27/woke-imperium-the-coming-confluence-between-social-justice-and-neoconservatism/

Woke Imperium: The Coming Confluence Between Social Justice and Neoconservatism

By Christopher Mott


Key Findings:

    The advocates of American primacy within the United States foreign policy 
establishment historically rely on prevailing ideological trends of the time to 
justify interventionism abroad. The new ‘woke’ face of American hegemony and 
projects of empire is designed to project the U.S. as an international moral 
police rather than a conventional great power—and the result is neo-imperialism 
with a moral face.

    This is an iterative and systemic process with an internal logic, not one 
controlled by a global cabal: when the older rationalizations for primacy, 
hegemony, and interventionism appear antiquated or are no longer persuasive, a 
new rationale that better reflects the ruling class norms of the era is adopted 
as a substitute. This is because the new schema is useful for the maintenance 
of the existing system of power.

    The rise of a ‘woke’ activist-driven, social justice-oriented 
politics—particularly among the members of academia, media, and the 
professional managerial class—has provided the latest ideological justification 
for interventionism, and it has become readily adopted by the U.S. foreign 
policy establishment. These groups now have an even greater level of symbiotic 
relationship with state actors.

    Professional selection and advancement under these conditions require elite 
signaling of loyalty to ‘progressive’ universalism as the trending 
state-sanctioned ideology, which further fuels the push towards 
interventionism. This combination of factors encourages a new institutional and 
elite consensus around trending shibboleths.

    The emerging hegemonic posture and its moral imperialism are at odds with a 
sober and realistic appraisal of U.S. interests on the world stage, as they 
create untenable, maximalist, and utopian goals that clash with the concrete 
realities on which U.S. grand strategy must be based.

    The liberal Atlanticist tendency to push moralism and social engineering 
globally has immense potential to create backlash in foreign, especially 
non-Western, societies that will come to identify the West as a whole with 
niche, late-modern progressive ideals—thus motivating new forms of 
anti-Westernism.

Read the full paper at the download link (url).

Executive Summary:

The primacist, interventionist wing of the United States foreign policy 
establishment—’the Blob’—has a long history of using prevailing moralist trends 
to serve as ideological justifications for expansionist and hawkish policies. 
From Presidents William McKinley and Woodrow Wilson on through the militant 
democracy promotion of the George W. Bush administration, this process often 
mutated to accommodate the de jour proclivities and entrenched biases of the 
policy-making class. The newest iteration of this process is the adoption of 
social justice causes and rhetoric as the explicit goals of the United States’ 
foreign policy. Such use and weaponization of the language of justice to 
advance the foreign policy objectives of the liberal Atlanticist Blob is 
particularly evident against regions and countries the West believes actively 
challenge the Liberal International Order (LIO) status quo or where it seeks to 
justify military and economic interventions on normative grounds.

Rather than a coordinated conspiracy directed from a central organization or 
even a conscious desire on the part of the participants however, this process 
of adopting, incorporating, and cultivating new rationales to sustain what is 
an idealist and internationalist strategic culture in the United States has 
become routinized. This entrenchment of systemic moralism in the American 
national security apparatus has been facilitated, and is at least partly 
driven, by a highly competitive professional class vying to secure their 
position in the system by using virtue signaling to demonstrate class 
solidarity to their higher ranks. This mimetic mechanism incentivizes pushing 
the envelope and chasing trending causes (normative mimicry)—but always in 
service of the imperial needs of the state where expansionism and primacy are 
viewed as the triumph of a universalized American conception of virtue over 
those forces which are viewed as being on ‘the wrong side of history’. Under 
such moralistic conditions, prudence, moderation, and narrower conceptions of 
interest—provisos of realism—could be effectively vilified as enabling 
oppression and injustice.

The current Wokeist incarnation of American globalist evangelism seeks not only 
to change the governments of other nations, but engineer their very cultures 
according to the Western progressive model. Its universalist framing of human 
values could be readily applied to violate or undermine the sovereignty of 
alternate political or cultural systems and justify those interventions for the 
domestic Western audiences in the name of ‘moral responsibility’.

This white paper seeks to elucidate the often hidden processes and mechanisms 
that have led to the consolidation of this “woke imperium” of moralistic 
cosmopolitanism: its historical roots, present day trends, and possible future 
evolution. It is also intended as a guide for advocates of realism and 
restraint: to help realists understand the nature of the resistance they are 
likely to encounter from certain sectors of the foreign policy establishment 
and their sympathizers as they try to realign U.S. foreign policy goals with 
more limited and concrete national interests.


Dr. Christopher Mott (@chrisdmott) is a Research Fellow at the Institute for 
Peace & Diplomacy and a former researcher and desk officer at the U.S. 
Department of State.
#  distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
#  <nettime>  is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
#  collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
#  more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l
#  archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nett...@kein.org
#  @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject:

Reply via email to