-contemporary-art-
and-new-media-31944
Her R/W aspiration was positive – did we see call outs for Linux install
parties – artist residency etc. on E-FLUX at CUNY?
I wonder if Artforum could have listed an article to counter this tried text in
their archive? Instead of erase, lengthy discussions of Post
Browsing through the files of Amsterdam?s Institute for Social History (as
you do) I found Tjebbe van Tijan?s excellent essay written in 1998. Below
is a short taster. Full essay to be found:
http://socialhistory.org/sites/default/files/docs/digitial-ways-forgetting.pdf
Digital ways of Forgett
This discussion, especially related to questions of "mindful
disconnection," recalls Sigfried Giedion's 1948 "anonymous history,"
"Mechanization Takes Command."
http://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=acls;idno=heb01139
As he put it:
"Never has mankind possessed so many instruments for
Rousseau comes fleetingly to mind:
"The problem is to find a form of association which will defend and
protect with the whole common force the person and goods of each
associate, and in which each, while uniting himself with all, may
still obey himself alone, and remain as free as before."
And
Felix Wrote
> Where the terms makes no sense, in my view (and also in Florian's),
> is sociologically. The most powerful forces that transform globalized
> societies, are all dependent on, and amplified by, digital
> technologies. If anything, we are in the middle of the historical
> run of this
I mainly agree.
The realistic take has always been and should always be: Whatever
> technology and/or social process that can be used to strengthen
> the interests of strategic power, will be used to strengthen the
> interests of strategic power.
>
> Is a very apt description of what is the main
On 10/03/14 11:57, kontakt |�florian kuhlmann wrote:
> Am 10.03.2014 um 09:51 schrieb mp:
>
>> and this is not a joke either: communal/collective spaces for
>> communication can be really good. A place to meet. A digital
>> square.
>
> i have to admit i less and less believe in this. the only t
Dear nettimers,
While reading another excellent discussion on the post-digital /
disconnectivity on nettime, I was reminded of a piece I co-authored
with Howard Rheingold slightly over seven years ago for the theme
issue Hybrid Space of Open, Journal for Art and the Public Domain.
At the time I
Am 10.03.2014 um 09:51 schrieb mp:
> and this is not a joke either: communal/collective spaces for
> communication can be really good. A place to meet. A digital square.
i have to admit i less and less believe in this.
the only thing i am strongly recognizing is, that friends, people and socitey
On 10/03/14 07:29, Sandra Braman wrote:
> 2% of people -- across socio-economic class, meaning it isn't about
> cost -- do not want a telephone in the home
>
> having lived that way for many years, i can report that the
> pleasures of it are quite real
as long as you have somewhere to go to s
.@kein.org
Sent: Sunday, March 9, 2014 8:58:27 PM
Subject: Re: Post-digital
Quoth Felix Stalder:
> Enzensberger's text was just a joke, and the FAZ printed
> it because it would stir controversy, not because it had much to offer
> intellectually.
Was it really just a joke? I'm no
Quoth Felix Stalder:
> Enzensberger's text was just a joke, and the FAZ printed
> it because it would stir controversy, not because it had much to offer
> intellectually.
Was it really just a joke? I'm not so sure dismissing it as that is
appropriate. Sure it necessarily isn't a deep critique of
> On 03/03/2014 08:19 PM, Florian Cramer wrote:
>
>> # What is 'Post-digital'?
>
> Florian and I have been talking for a long time now about the
> notion of "post-digital", with me being rather skeptical about its
> usefulness. I still am, but Flori
On 03/03/2014 08:19 PM, Florian Cramer wrote:
> # What is 'Post-digital'?
Florian and I have been talking for a long time now about the
notion of "post-digital", with me being rather skeptical about its
usefulness. I still am, but Florian's text clarifies a lot for
14 matches
Mail list logo
