The point is that it does take place, and that it places severe
constraints on the organization that suffers from it. Whether the
celeb-status is sought as a reward or loathed does not make any
difference. Celeb-status creates a vulnerable focus point for the
organization.
In today's
Am 10.06.16 um 18:30 schrieb Frank Rieger:
I do see a large difference between the US and the European scene
though. The "celebrity" problem you diagnosed is most prevalent in the
US. The idea of "rockstar" hackers, programmers etc. has never taken so
much hold in Europe or Germany.
Am
Dear Frank,
thank you for speaking out. I choose to consider your words both as a
personal opinion, and as of a representative of CCC as a whole, althou I
know that there is no such thing as a "collective opinion", specially
within such an anti-authoritatian (& "chaotic" by design)
On 10 Jun 2016, at 13:07, Patrice Riemens wrote:
> It has a lot to do with numbers. These, surprisingly, looked to be in
> our favor. Gatherings were ever bigger, the amount of people and
> resources mobilized were ever larger. It was probably a delusion. Just
> as the numbers
__
'
*** It has a lot to do with numbers. These, surprisingly, looked to be in
our favor. Gatherings were ever bigger, the amount of people and
resources mobilized were ever larger. It was probably a delusion. Just
The social, and political 'sad demise' (the Hinglish word for death) of
Jacob 'Jake' Appelbaum is for me symptomatic, and symbolic, for an epoch
definitively coming to its close. To me at least, it resonates with the
words of Rieger and Gonggrijp, years ago at a CCC conference: "we lost
the