HRC refers to Hillary Rodham Clinton.
If you mean BLM, this is Black Lives Matter.
I don't know what is referred to by LEO.
People often refer to Mr. T as DJT as well.
I hope that this helps a bit.
Regards,
Lisa
*For MJF course wa
ng the list at
> nettime-l-ow...@mail.kein.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of nettime-l digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>1. Re: The Guardian's Summary of Julian Assange's
The proper assassination piece needs a bit more logic than this:
1. 6 years ago someone claimed with no evidence that RU owned leakers =>
2. this year leakers published *true* information on the beige cabal =>
3. conclude that leakers are handled by RU.
Note how a single proven event (#2) is sa
14/01/19/the-liberal-surveillance-state/
best
Lincoln
__
From: carl guderian
To: nettim...@kein.org
Sent: Wednesday, 4 January 2017 8:41 AM
Subject: Re: The Guardian's Summary of Julian Assange's Inter
been charitable to him while pouring hate on the HRC
folks. Why not both, as Zoidberg says?
Frank
----- Original message -
From: Flick Harrison
To: Nettime
Subject: Re: The Guardian's Summary of Julian Assange's Interview
Went Viral and
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2017 10:01:04 -0800
Th
Hi all,
I read the La Repubblica interview. The Guardian certainly took liberties with
it, but Assange doesn't come off any better in the full interview.
Assange implies that Russia doesn't really need a Wikileaks because of
competition from the "...many vibrant publications, online blogs, and
This is really important.
What I’m seeing out there on social media is the various left factions
discrediting every critique of Trump that the other factions have made, in
order to centralize their issues in the coming left reckonings. The
libertarian socialist left has really embraced the op
On 01/03/2017 10:18 AM, Patrice Riemens wrote:
On 2017-01-02 22:45, C.Robbins wrote:
Without question the article on Assange was the epitomy of "bad
journalism", "Fake news" or whatever trending tagline one wishes to
assign to biased delivery of, and 24/7 consumption of propaganda
... and, yes,
On 2017-01-02 22:45, C.Robbins wrote:
> Without question the article on Assange was the epitomy of "bad
> journalism", "Fake news" or whatever trending tagline one wishes to
> assign to biased delivery of, and 24/7 consumption of propaganda
> ... and, yes, Ben Jacobs, accompanied by thousands of o
Without question the article on Assange was the epitomy of "bad journalism",
"Fake news" or whatever trending tagline one wishes to assign to biased
delivery of, and 24/7 consumption of propaganda ... and, yes, Ben Jacobs,
accompanied by thousands of other "journalists", should be hung out to d
https://theintercept.com/2016/12/29/the-guardians-summary-of-julian-assanges-interview-went-viral-and-was-completely-false/
The Guardian?s Summary of Julian Assange?s Interview Went Viral and
Was Completely False
Glenn Greenwald
December 29 2016, 2:41 p.m.
Julian Assange is a deeply polarizin
11 matches
Mail list logo