On 08/03/12 16:13, miltosmane...@gmail.com wrote:
I absolutely agree. .art is simply ridiculous, who wants to be called .art?
Various of my bots, and several projects I have in mind to critique the
prevalent informal institutional theory.
:-)
- Rob.
# distributed via nettime: no
On the other hand it could be a good way to dicuss what is non.art etc.
The internet is a game,
H.
Am 09.03.2012 21:52, schrieb Rob Myers:
On 08/03/12 16:13, miltosmane...@gmail.com wrote:
I absolutely agree. .art is simply ridiculous, who wants to be called .art?
Various of my bots, and
Also, I demand a .marx domain.
- Rob.
# distributed via nettime: no commercial use without permission
# nettime is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
# collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
# more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l
#
r...@robmyers.org (Sat 03/10/12 at 06:25 PM +):
Also, I demand a .marx domain.
The question's moot now because NTIA just announced that it was canceling
the RFP for IANA:
https://www.fbo.gov/index?s=opportunitymode=formtab=coreid=e90ec616702fd6c52c91c0e67ccbf501_cview=0
In
...@kein.org
Subject: Re: nettime What do you think about .art?
r...@robmyers.org (Sat 03/10/12 at 06:25 PM +):
Also, I demand a .marx domain.
The question's moot now because NTIA just announced that it was canceling
the RFP for IANA:
https://www.fbo.gov/index?s=opportunitymode=formtab=coreid
Art traditionally ends up in the wrong hands, there is no inherent
problem with this.
Thinking ahead, it will be so much more amusing if Dow or Mattel
snatch .art (barbie.art is worth $200K by itself), than some 'body'
composed of pompous internationally-recognized benevolent and
independent
IMHO one should never call oneself an artist, .art is .kitsch
Only onthers may call one an artist. Well, it could be a space of
art-dealers (behind bars!), but that would give it some drive into
.art and not.art, which could ne the most important domainname, that I
claim here and now as a
I don't think the domain name system is the place to be fighting for
the small, independent artist. Leave it to go to the enormous
corporations, and create stuff whereever; in the cracks, the unseen
places, darknets etc, as well as wherever in the public. Names are
as valuable as what they
If Desiree's idea takes shape, and if a bid is successful, there is
scope for a successful registry with a balanced model :)
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 6:37 AM, Morlock Elloi morlockel...@yahoo.comwrote:
Art traditionally ends up in the wrong hands, there is no inherent
problem with this.
...@googlemail.com
Sender: nettime-l-boun...@mail.kein.org
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2012 22:33:28
To: nettime's_roving_reporternettim...@kein.org
Subject: Re: nettime What do you think about .art?
IMHO one should never call oneself an artist, .art is .kitsch
...
# distributed via nettime: no commercial
Hi,
I happened to meet Desiree last night and therefore think that her mail
does not explain the issue as well as she did in our conversation.
Our old 'friend' ICANN (Ted, we miss your comments on that;-) is
releasing new generic Top Level Domains. It is posible that some
business interests
Hello Armin,
Desiree's concerns are valid, and it is a good proposition.
Sivasubramanian M
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Armin Medosch ar...@easynet.co.uk wrote:
Hi,
I happened to meet Desiree last night and therefore think that her mail
does not explain the issue as well as she did in
Hi
There is a limited opportunity to apply for dotART domain name by April 12.
Is there any inking of support ? Or do people think that no artist
would like to have a .art domain?
dotArt(s), in plural though, has been proposed once in 1997 before
ICANN was set up the process for adding TLDs
13 matches
Mail list logo
