Simo Sorce writes:
> I have a question though, why C89 support ?
Code was written for c89 aka ansi-c. So it's not difficult to keep
supporting it, and it might help for some (embedded mainly, I imagine)
compilers.
That said, I'm about to delete nettle-stdint.h, and require that the
compiler
On 07.01.19 19:24, Simo Sorce wrote:
> They seem minor enough not to really need a new release IMO, people can
> get them from master as needed. Or maybe you can commit patches on the
> 3.4 branch so people can find them more easily if they really care.
>
> I have a question though, why C89
They seem minor enough not to really need a new release IMO, people can
get them from master as needed. Or maybe you can commit patches on the
3.4 branch so people can find them more easily if they really care.
I have a question though, why C89 support ?
C99 is already almost 20y old already ...
